User talk:J3wman

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Judas Iscariot, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Judas Iscariot was changed by J3wman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88162 on 2011-02-09T13:31:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL)

The article Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not suffciently notable fictional character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Travelbird (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL) for deletion

The article Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Eegit Lampard (SEL) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travelbird (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Travelbird (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. And please do not edit closed AfD discussions Travelbird (talk) 17:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted, quite honestly, because of this edit. The concern was that you post in an unrelated article about a chap being "a turgid cell" on one day, and then post an unreferenced article about him the next. If you believe this individual to be notable, you can go ahead and find sources that say so now. No need to wait for the article to be restored - show that the subject is notable, and that there are sources to prove it, and a new article that complies with out policies can be written. I must note, though, that edits such as this don't do anything to prove your point; quite the opposite, attacks on other editors are very likely to result in your being blocked from editing. If you can be civil, and if you can find sources for your article, great - we're happy to work with you. Otherwise... not so much. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 18:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I might add that adding a reference to the page's subject touching his private parts certainly doesn't help either. Travelbird (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion to create article on Punjabi wikipedia first

Might I make an honest suggestion regarding your attempt to add an article on Stan Eegit Lampard? I am assuming good faith on your part, but you might be losing something in translating your article to the English language. Could you consider establishing this same article on the Punjabi wikipedia first? That could establish the credibility of the subject with oversight by native speakers of the language who are also more likely to understand the folklore and culture, as well as be able to come up with reputable citations. Once established there, you could put in a request to translate the article. If Punjabi is not your native language, you still may be able to find an appropriate wikipedia in your own language (I don't know if it is possible, but I think it is worth attempting). In any case, expanding other language wikipedias is an explicit goal of the Wikimedia Foundation. And please, refrain from insulting other editors. It's just not good form to call someone a racist. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stan F Owen

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Travelbird (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Borkificator (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]