User talk:J. Sketter/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:J. Sketter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 19:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for info. --J. Sketter (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Help
Hi, J. Sketter. Corect my edit for fi:Luettelo Kiinan hallinnollisista alueista bruttokansantuotteen mukaan pls, thanks. Cncs (talk) 02:28, May 31, 2011(UTC)
Wikipedia is not a webforum
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Feminism, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Overly political correct WP administaror? No wonder when one takes a look of your messy userpage full of whistles & bells. Try to keep your brain, tho, man. And I promise to equal that. --J. Sketter (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Arbitration Committee elections 2017
|
---|
Hello, J. Sketter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phil Taylor (darts player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rob Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Paige Patterson
Hi J. Sketter. I see you've been editing Wikipedia for some time now, though haven't edited very much. I hope you don't mind me pointing out how very difficult it can be working on articles that fall under general editing sanctions, especially biographical information of living persons. Such articles require very strict adherence to Wikipedia's content policies. They are not a venue for casual editing, nor a welcoming environment for learning Wikipedia policy.
I assume you're unaware of all that has recently been reported about Paige Patterson. I haven't been keeping up, choosing to wait until the dust settles and journalists have had time to review all that's happened. If you want to wade into it at this point, please work from clearly independent and reliable sources to minimize the likelihood of violating content policies. --Ronz (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks. I've been in Wikipedia quite a long time. Not so many edits in the English one thou. And no, me neither follows keenly Pattersson case, but merely text around that appears clearly questionable. Like text that was before my edit here[1] I will re-read this message and you edit summary with a thought . As a non-native English speaker and with the aforementioned relative inexperience of this wiki I take the leisure to ponder over things a bit. It's always possible I get too angry to outright lying editors and as a consequence overdo it some way. --J. Sketter (talk) 13:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Arbitration Committee elections 2018
|
---|
Hello, J. Sketter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Discretionary Sanctions Alerts
About gender related and BLP topics
|
---|
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Warning
If you disrupt ANI again, you risk being blocked. You undid another editor's legitimate comments about you calling them a "rant" (see here). You're lucky I am only warning you rather than blocking you outright.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic banned indefinitely from subjects related to GamerGate, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned ANI discussion
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Guy (help!) 11:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
You are also cautioned that personal attacks and violations of the policy on bigraphies may lead to an immediate block without further warning. Guy (help!) 11:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)