User talk:J.P. Doul

Welcome to my talk page.

If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will have your talk page on watch. You may place {{talkback}} on the top of my talk page if you wish.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply). Please do not use asterisks ("*").
I will always respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page or the article Talk page, so you may want to Watch this page until I respond.

Gnana Robinson

{{helpme}} This article needs more cleanup for POV and other issues than one editor can possibly provide. I resisted the temptation to simply tag it for speedy deletion. Where is the best place to request help with fixing this article? —J.P. Doul (^TALK/_{CONTRIBUTIONS}) 18:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page, maybe. Or you can search around for a Wikiproject that's relevant (WikiProject India maybe?). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging it for speedy deletion is not the best idea, but if you feel the article is not worthy you could always nominate it for AfD. Or, of course, you could be bold and just edit/rewrite it yourself. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to do an AfD because the article needs cleanup, not deletion; the subject meets guidelines for notability, etc. And I am going to try cleaning it up, but I'll probably need help just for the amount of work that's required. I guess I'll try to find a WikiProject per TenPoundHammer's suggestion. —J.P. Doul (^TALK/_{CONTRIBUTIONS}) 18:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what -- give it a bit of a clean-up, then whistle down my way and I will be glad to lend a further hand. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nota Bene (software)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nota Bene (software), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]