User talk:J'onn J'onzz

Speedy deletion of Matt Wilson (animator)

A tag has been placed on Matt Wilson (animator) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Grsz ^X 02:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please review Wikipedia guidelines regarding civility. Your behavior lately has been inappropriate. Grsz ^X 02:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe the Plumber

I have nominated Joe the Plumber, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe the Plumber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Onorem ♠Dil 02:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Onorem ♠Dil 02:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vermont

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Vermont page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 11:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of D.L. Hughley Breaks the News

A tag has been placed on D.L. Hughley Breaks the News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jonathan (talk • contribs • am I wrong?) 02:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to The Powerpuff Girls

Most of this sounds like fanfic, and at the very least has been reverted due no citations. Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Please don't add {{stub}} tags to talk pages as you did to Talk:Washington's 5th congressional district and Talk:Résumé candidate - it just wastes time of stub-sorters. Thanks. PamD (talk) 07:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

A situation involving you is at WP:ANI#Underfist: Halloween Bash. Schuym1 (talk) 01:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bob Dylan Newsletter

Greetings! This message has been sent courtesy of WikiProject Bob Dylan, which you are a member of. Our project now has two Featured Articles: Bob Dylan and Like a Rolling Stone, and three Good Articles: Mr. Tambourine Man, It's All Over Now, Baby Blue and Madhouse on Castle Street. Suggestions are now being canvassed for the next article to work on, as part of the WP Dylan collaboration team. Please voice your opinion here. Regards, --Richhoncho (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PWeeHurman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confused about this Sockpuppet thing

Not sure why I've been banned over this indefinitely? It's because my name is close to some of PWeeHurman's sockpuppets' names, right? J'onn J'onzz is a comic book character, the Martian Manhunter... It is not some unique name PWeeHurman thought up... Also, from what I gather, PWee began doing this years after I first registered in 2006. I've consistently edited since then and while some of my earlier edits WERE vandalism, so I can understand why I am being viewed with suspicion here, but I haven't done that in quite a while, so... I suppose about the extent of my argument for my being unbanned is simply that I am not PWeeHurman. From my scan of his accounts, they have mostly been blocked before they could make too many edits... and like I said, I've been editing for four years now. I can't comprehend why I would make all these sockpuppet accounts when my current one has never been suspended. Besides, all the sockpuppets of this guy are fairly explicitly this guy's sockpuppets, while I am... well... not, and I think there is a good deal of evidence if you look through my contributions. Well, get back to me I suppose. I would hate to have my account of four years on a very useful site thrown away just because someone else has been using a similar (and fairly common, I've met a few other J'onn J'onzzes online, usually ones that actually had the same, correct spelling as me, unlike this person's JonyJonnz or whatever) name.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith that no one is attempting to "get back at you". The name is inline with one of his preferred naming schemas, and so was the tone of your post. If you are not a sock, the check user will clear you and you will be unblocked, and you have my deepest apologies. As you have looked through the case, I'm sure you can see why we err on the side of caution with the breadth of his edits. I have made note of your protest and explanation at the SPI page for you. If you wish to do a formal unblock request, you need to use the {{unblock}} template per the instructions you should see when you try to edit. Meanwhile, I'd suggest revisiting WP:AGF and [{WP:CIVIL]] regarding the post you made at Talk:Dragon Ball [1] that first brought you to my attention and drew my concern, as it was the sort of post PWeeHurman would make, not an editor seeking legitimate, polite discourse.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|The primary reason I'd like to appeal this is because I am not a sock puppet of PWeeHurman. I understand that my username is somewhat similar to some of his sockpuppets and judging by the number of accounts he has created I understand the desire to prevent him from having anymore, but I think if a more thorough review of my editing history was conducted it would be found that I simply am not PWeeHurman, and that while I have made ill advised edits they are not nearly to the extremes that PWeeHurman seems to resort to. I am not sure how similar our debating styles are, as I haven't looked through all his statements, and surely mine is not perfect due to my youth but I am certain there are differences.

I am not assuming there is some sort of conspiracy against me, I am simply saying that I do not wish to be banned due to a username misunderstanding. I've been looking up previous cases with similar circumstances, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JoseinWinnipeg/Archive so there is certainly a precedent for bannings due to mistaken identity. I'm not sure if this PWeeHurman usually signs up on Proxy websites or not, but you could do an IP check on me, I am not using one and I doubt my IP address is anywhere near his his normal IP address, if he has ever used one.

Thanks, I will try to be more civil in the future (if I am allowed one) if that is part of the reason I was banned, as I understand from the post by AnmaFinotera.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Misidentification. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: jpgordon^{::==( o )}

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PWeeHurman. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 21:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MTV's Oddities

The article MTV's Oddities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable show. Sources are either MTV's or site selling the DVD.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ged UK 14:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MTV's Oddities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MTV's Oddities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTV's Oddities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ged UK 20:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zero Hour: Crisis in Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please don't change the format of dates. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this article.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice.

Here you hijacked the article Zhang Heng and lied in your edit summary. (WP Editor 2011 (talk) 03:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Seven warnings, including a final warning, seems a bit much for something that occurred in September 2008, although you should never have done that and doing it again would be a pretty bad idea. Ironic that the editor who warned you did the same thing recently. Dougweller (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, J'onn J'onzz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United States vice-presidential debate, 1976 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States vice-presidential debate, 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States vice-presidential debate, 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, J'onn J'onzz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, J'onn J'onzz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hi

Welcome back Herostratus (talk) 08:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Hi. I never really went anywhere. Always been using Wikipedia. Must be 15 years now.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 00:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but not that often. Just wanted to say hi and that you are noticed and appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Not Just Another Cable News Show

The article Not Just Another Cable News Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable show

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]