User talk:Izumifuchu

Welcome!

Hello, Izumifuchu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Granville Court

The article Granville Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable in any way

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Granville Court

The article Granville Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Granville Court for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Granville Court is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granville Court until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 12:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Granville Hotel Banqueting Hall

The article Granville Hotel Banqueting Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. No WP:reliable sources. There are thousands of closed pubs all over the country - what makes this worthy of an encyclopaedia article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Ethelbert's church, Ramsgate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OSB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Victoria Pavilion, Ramsgate

Hello Izumifuchu,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, The Royal Victoria Pavilion, Ramsgate, may be copied from http://www.thanetgazette.co.uk/gem-Edwardian-architecture/story-20726405-detail/story.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites. (Even if you own copyright to the text on another site or have permission, there are steps we have to take to verify that. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how.)

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the author of the article that appeared in the Thanet Gazette mentioned above Izumifuchu (talk) 20:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Royal Victoria Pavilion, Ramsgate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Royal Victoria Pavilion, Ramsgate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thanetgazette.co.uk/gem-Edwardian-architecture/story-20726405-detail/story.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Louis Negin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mark Louis Negin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Louis Negin (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require biographies to have in-line citations, see WP:INTREFVE. We also require significant coverage in multiple, independent, secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Louis Negin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Izumifuchu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Izumifuchu. I believe you must know Mark as you state you took the photograph of him in the draft? What is your relationship to Mark? It is a requirement to disclose possible conflicts of interest under the Wikimedia Terms of Conditions, and you should let me know your relationship before you make further edits. Qcne (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Louis Negin

Hello, Izumifuchu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Louis Negin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Louis Negin

Hello, Izumifuchu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Louis Negin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]