User talk:Izmar5/sandbox/Neo-Confucianism

Hi Izzy. Nice contributions! I would just recommend changing "approximently" to "approximately" in the second paragraph of the Origins sections. Also, there is an "as" in the second half of the first sentence in your edit. I think this sentence might be read more clearly if it's written without it like this:

Neo-Confucianism was both a revival of classical Confucianism updated to align with the social values of the Song dynasty and a reaction to the challenges of Buddhist and Daoist philosophy and religion which emerged during the Zhou and Han dynasties.

Or maybe you could split it into two sentences, so readers can more readily recognize the two separate factors that led to Neo-Confucianism.

Other than that, good work. Your additions really helped clarify the beginnings of Neo-Confucianism and emphasized the significance of Zhu Xi's work which was missing from the original article. Your contributions were informative and coherent greatly improving the article's clarity.

VOsanyinpeju (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)VOsanyinpeju