User talk:Izadso

September 2011

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Review of block. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your information. I read the discussion on Review of block and I would like to get unblocked. Thank you. --Izadso (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC) To check that I´m not a single purpose account you can check my contribs at de [2] No blocks, no vandalism. thanks again. --Izadso (talk) 20:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Various editors have chimed in during the AN discussion and the general opinion there is that you should both be blocked for disruptive editing. I'm willing to consider unblocking, though, but there are a couple of conditions you must agree to:

you disengage completely from making any edits regarding Michael Kühntopf, broadly construed and across all namespaces; just pretend he doesn't exist. His editing pattern has been duly noticed and, should he start again, he'll be blocked, so there is no need for you to keep an eye on him;
you disclose all of your sockpuppetts and accept that you will be restricted to only one account, this one;
you undertake not to adopt such an approach any longer: you will not edit war and will not follow an editor around, reverting all his edits — which is what we call wikihounding —; if you should be caught in a dispute, in future, you will try to discuss with the other user and, if it doesn't work, try WP:DR; if your interlocutor is editing disruptively, just report him to the administrators — WP:AIV, WP:ANEW or WP:ANI, as the case may be —.

If you accept these conditions, I'll be happy to unblock, warning you, however, that any violation will result in your indefinite block being reinstated. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 09:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thats sounds fair to me. I accept all of your conditions. I have no sockpuppets and this is my only account. Thank you for unblocking me, if there will be problems in the future I will act as you asked me to. --Izadso (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad! Since you accepted my conditions, I'm about to unblock you. Happy editing! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

jewiki.net

Thought you may like to hear this site is now blacklisted. Darkness Shines (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

probably the best solution. Thanks for your work. --Izadso (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Are you a sockpuppet of Michael Kühntopf who wants to spam wikipedia with links to his own mini-wiki, called jewiki? 188.104.207.128 (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]