User talk:Iwritraccurateedits

January 2024

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Friedberg, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at John Friedberg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ResearcherStudierIam per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ResearcherStudierIam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iwritraccurateedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know the exact reason for my block. I do know I was accused of being a "sockpuppet" of another user. I don't know who this user is at all. I will admit that I did write some inaccurate edits that may be considered vandalism, and I have been warned for that, however I feel that it is completely unfair that I have been blocked for being the sockpuppet of an account I do not even own. Iwriteaccurateedits is my account and my only account. I did notice that the account you accused me of being a sockpuppet for did restore some of my vandalism on the John Freidberg article but I know nothing else of that user. I did leave a barnstar on their page though, where I really just wrote some random stuff that didn't even make sense and thanked them for restoring my vandalism on the John Freidberg article. I request I be unblocked, I have learned my lesson on vandalism and realize that at the time my edit on the John Freidberg article seemed like a good idea however now I realize it was not. For that, I apologize. I did decide to dig deeper however, into the reasons for my investigation, who's Illvia? They seem like a random account who has also been accused but I couldn't find much on them. Also I looked at some other articles that the guy ResarchstudyIam posted and they have my pieces of vandalism on it. Maybe he copied it and put it in other articles to vandalize??

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.