User talk:Iwant2write
The article Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, like all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to a one-revert restriction (1RR). You can read more about 1RR here. I encourage you to read about the rules that apply to all articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed here. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Casualties of the Gaza War (2008–09)
- added a link pointing to Islamic Jihad
- Karine A Affair
- added a link pointing to Gaza
- Palestinian political violence
- added a link pointing to Lynch
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
arbpia3
[edit]Hello. The arbitration committee has restricted editors with under 500 edits and 30 days tenure from editing pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. You can see this here. Until you reach 500 edits I have to ask that you refrain from editing such articles. Thanks, nableezy - 23:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Iran-Israeli cartoons
[edit]Re this. Do you have reliable sources analyzing impact of these cartoons on society? Why these and not the other ones? What about Iranian cartoons? Etc. So it is better to remove them. Zezen (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Last I checked images don't necessarily need to be extensively cited on Wikipedia. The question here is the value of having these compared to the value of not having them. I believe they add value and illustrate a point, if you would like to add some from the other perspective you are free to do so. Overall I think it is better to have the images than nothing at all and that you should at least provide a more substantial explanation as to why they should be removed given that other pages. I will admit that the images are not the best representation of said viewpoint but in my personal experience they illustrate one that is common. Iwant2write (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Your recent thanking me for my edit
[edit]You just thanked me for my edit.
Why don't you also join the discussion on the talk page?
I understand that you are not allowed to edit the actual article page because you did not complete 500 edits yet (you only have 291), but you are allowed to edit talk page.
P.S. I am advising you that when you edit these pages be very careful not to violate the 1RR rule. (You may not revert other edits more than one time withing 24 hours). The other biased users who strictly enforce wikipedia wikipedia rules when it benefits their POV - **will** block you if you do violate the 1RR. Caseeart (talk) 00:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Iwant2write. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Iwant2write. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Maison de la culture Ahuntsic-Cartierville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No reason to assume this building/service is notable; references are missing, and a quick internet search didn't produce any significant discussion.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)