Jump to content

User talk:Iurii Komogorov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Iurii Komogorov! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 14:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NSM

[edit]

Dear Iurii,

I have removed the section on in-form in the article on Natural Semantic Metalanguage. NSM is a tool for research in lexicography. As far as I see in-form’s aim is completely different (enabling communication, “escaping from the Linguistic Matrix” …), it is a type of pasigraphy, apparently not based on NSM. Furthermore it has not been recognised publicly, thus its importance for any topic remains unattestable. I hope you have als read my comments on your German talk page.

Best! --Chricho ∀ (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quality (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Object. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All sources must be WP:VERIFIABLE. You restored an edit that had a source that could not be identified and thus could not be verified, a link to a Google book on someone's library, which of course no one else could read. There was no "approval" by senior editors, we don't do that. Not even editors as senior as me can officially approve content. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ok, this has to stop. You are promoting/spamming your own blog, which fails WP:RS and cannot be used as a source. You've been warned before about similar edits. Doug Weller talk 15:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Quantity. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Iurii Komogorov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]