User talk:ItsMarkWbu

Boss n hug

Dont change the article. At the time, Banks and Bayley were known as Boss n Hug, dont rewrtite past names because today dont use that name--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree is correct. When listing their first title reign, they are to be referred to as The Boss ‘n’ Hug Connection, as that was the name they used throughout that entire first reign. When talking about their current reign, they are just simply Sasha Banks and Bayley. No different than Haas & Benjamin being called Team Angle during their first reign and The World’s Greatest Tag Team during their second reign. During their first reign you don’t write “Formerly Known As Team Angle.” OldSkool01 (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – DarkGlow (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, please don't remove Impact and legacy section from Sasha Banks. If you think language is problem then correct it instead removing entire section. Thank you Rtyggu (talk) 03:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then why don't you remove the section from Becky Lynch's article? Rtyggu (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How these have no notability? Talk before removing contents. You're not admin. Rtyggu (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was poorly formated about that? These are similar to those lines are in Becky Lynch's article. What nonsense are you talking about? Rtyggu (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bro! Will you respond to me or not? You remove content from Sasha Banks article even though I provided proper reference but not doing same with Becky Lynch article. Why are you biased? Rtyggu (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL

Sorry, but who are you to " personally exhort you to cease altering well-written "? That's not pretty WP:CIVIL, since I have editing articles since 2009. If you have any problem, use the talk page, but do not exhort me to do anything. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

As I've just caught sight of your message, I'd like to apologize if my request came off as ill-mannered or pushy. The sole intention of my edit summary was to urge you to keep an eye out for the types of errors that seem to plague a cardinal bunch of your revisions. Rest assured that your contributions are appreciated.

To address your issues with my line of verbiage – "exhort" means to strongly encourage someone to do something. It seems as though you've misapprehended what I was attempting to convey... all good, by the way. Happens to the best of us. ItsMarkWbu (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry for the delay. I want to apologize, maybe I took it a little personal and, in the last month, looks like every argument in Wikipedia is personal. Recently, I changed my mind about pro wrestling when I realized how Admins see the project. One of the main complains is that we focus too much on fictional storylines, so many of my edits are focused on "key points" of the career. I think the key point is the match itself, not weeks of promotion, brawls and contracts. Many articles follows the "On day X, Flair challenged Ronda to a match at Y. At the events, Flair won", but I think is simplier "Flair defeated Ronda at the event Y" and forget about the challenges. Also, I try to include a real life perspective. Instead of "after a turn, X wrestler accped Y offer to work togther and challenged for the tag team titles", I prefer "X and Y began to work together as a tag team", since the first is a little kayfabe (It's the promotion the one who dictates the tag teams, not kayfabe reasons). --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree's removal was correct. These intricacies aren't worth including. And when non-notable developments are given as much weight as the match itself, overwhelming the paragraph, it's silly to call them a footnote. KyleJoan^talk 10:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced file size

Hello. I see that with a lot of the files you upload, you don't need the bot to reduce the file size. So that makes me believe that a certain program is being used to reduce file size for non-free files. If you can, please share the name or website of this program because I desperately need it. It can help me from not getting screwed all the time. ChallengeCick (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I use reduceimages.com ItsMarkWbu (talk) 19:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research, proseline, edit summary

Please be mindful of these. None of the sources you included supported "reuniting the team as a duo" or "Naomi earned her first title victory since 2017". What relevance does Vega and Carmella accepting the challenge have? What is the importance of the company announcing the other participants prior to the match happening? It happened. Just leave it at that rather than writing in proseline per WP:PW/BIO. And please do your best to fill in the summary field at all times. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 10:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure to be more cognizant with regard to future edits. Thank you for your input. ItsMarkWbu (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Banks' modeling career section

Hi @ItsMarkWbu:, I added couple of days ago a modeling section at Sasha Banks' Wikipedia page, but I saw you moved it to Other media section, under the claim that "the encompassing info is too nominal to warrant their inclusion". While also modeling for New York Fashion Week with Naomi, she is also set to appear on Vogue Scandinavia next month in October. Isn't that something to justify a new section of modeling career on her Wiki page? I know nothing about fashion lol, but I imagine being on Vogue is pretty important. Also, she is set to model for Los Angeles Fashion Week in October as well. SeosiWrestling (talk) 16:19, September 24, 2022 (UTC)

Midnights

Hi. I really do appreciate your efforts. But the lead is the most crucial part of an article, and it must be easy to read, skim, and understand in layman's terms. I suggest you go through WP:LEAD. The sentences should be simple, crisp and easy to follow. ℛonherry☘ 21:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:All Out (2024) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Out (2024) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SmackDown (2024) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SmackDown (2024) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]