User talk:Italiancorsair

March 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zirid dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 14:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kabyle people, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 20:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdelkader Madjaoui (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What massive impact?

Literally nothing of note stated in draft.

Unless reliable independent sources are discussing subject's impact it is unlikely to be notable.

Even if they are discussing, such language is not encyclopedic and should stick to purely factual statements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdelkader Madjaoui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Italiancorsair! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Algerian War, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you make another unexplained and disruptive edit like this again, you risk being reported to administrators. You've received plenty of warnings already. R Prazeres (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not unexplained or disruptive, rather a normal edit, with updated information. I'll be reporting you to administrators for vandalising the page. Italiancorsair (talk) 22:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Idrisid dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White slavery. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And stop pushing your own personal, completely baseless WP:OR like you did here at Zirid dynasty and here at Kingdom of Tlemcen. R Prazeres (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Italiancorsair, please stop adding unsourced and rather nonsensical content (especially maps). SimoooIX (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not see that i've sourced the map, so what's your reasoning on removing it? Italiancorsair (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. You're wrong, I sourced it, and what do you mean nonsensical? I put in 2 sources in reality. So what's your reason of the map removal? Italiancorsair (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have discussed maps on nearly all of these articles many times before and arrived at stable versions based completely on actual maps published in reliable references (e.g. like this dedicated atlas). The maps you proposed have no resemblance to reliable publications and are clearly based on your own particular interpretation, with significant errors and fictions (again, already addressed before). Saying you added "sources" isn't enough, since it's easy to write down sources and pretend that they justify your own WP:OR. You're not the first one to do this and this kind of original content has been explicitly rejected before. If you want to argue the issue, then present your case at the article talk pages. It's not everyone else's job to satisfy you, it's your job to convince others. If consensus doesn't materialize, then the change is not accepted. That's how Wikipedia works. These same points have been repeated for other editors (both current ones and former ones), so you are no exception.

You already have a history of disruptive editing, and instead of being more careful and listening to the concerns of more experienced editors, you repeatedly resort to edit-warring. I also remind you that there is a Wikipedia policy on civility, which guides productive discussion. Making baseless assumptions about other editors and attributing imagined motivations to them (as you did here and here), just because your edit was reverted, does not follow that policy. If this continues, it will get to the point where it's worth reporting you to administrators, but it won't help you obtain consensus for your changes. R Prazeres (talk) 22:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, but you are Moroccan, it's pretty obvious here, no doubt about that, all of your edits + created pages are of Fes and Marrakesh pages, lol. Also the maps that you're showing are of a timeline before gained lands, so how would the map ever be made? Also I haven't had the intention of edit warring, rather changing what's wrong to what's right Italiancorsair (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

R Prazeres has made many appreciated contributions to articles that concern the Islamic monuments of Algeria as well. For example they have created the Tashfiniya Madrasa and expanded the article of the Great Mosque of Tlemcen. they made similar contributions to other articles on cultural heritage sites of other north African countries and Spain.

What you're doing now is called a personal attack. you should stop it. Otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. SimoooIX (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're going to block me from editing for a personal attack. Love ya logic mate. Also, it makes sense how he's made over 50+ edits on Fes and Marrakesh based "pages"... Lol. Also he's the same guy who claims the Zayyanids are a branch of Marinids. It's not a personal attack, rather a fact. Do better bro Italiancorsair (talk) 09:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

hey mate! I noticed your recent contributions to the Ottoman Algeria article, and I wanted to extend an invitation to join our Discord server. Were we can discuss and collaborate on improving the quality of articles related to the evolving history of Algeria :https://discord.gg/AGJwtzzV Tayeb188 (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Hammadid expedition against the Almoravids

Hello, Italiancorsair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Hammadid expedition against the Almoravids, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abdelkader Madjaoui

Hello, Italiancorsair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abdelkader Madjaoui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:First Hammadid expedition against the Almoravids

Hello, Italiancorsair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Hammadid expedition against the Almoravids".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abdelkader Madjaoui

Hello, Italiancorsair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdelkader Madjaoui".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]