User talk:It Is Me Here/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:It Is Me Here. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey de Bocland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Margaret (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool update
Hey It Is Me Here. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Support for posting this nomination at ITN/RD seems universal (I support it), but you have done so without the article being updated per the RD requirements of a five sentence update. You should reverse your action immediately. Thanks. μηδείς (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- In fairness, the Project page says that "a five-sentence update is generally considered to be more than enough," rather than it being a minimum requirement. In any case, I hope the article has now been updated enough to pass this criterion anyway. It Is Me Here t / c 18:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Courtesy notification
Please see discussion at Help talk:Citation Style 1#Reboot: inconsistent citation style due to change in long-standing URL v PMC parameters. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:37, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Bw anarchsit flag.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bw anarchsit flag.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
CAT:Novel stub listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CAT:Novel stub. Since you had some involvement with the CAT:Novel stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
WT:RUSSIA
Restored; sorry about that, but it was the result of an edit conflict, and I never saw that you'd commented. For future reference, you need not ask me; it would have been fine for you to restore it yourself. Nyttend (talk) 14:43, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello It Is Me Here/Archive 6! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Okeyes (WMF) (talk • contribs) 21:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 17, 2013; 16:19 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezhiki (talk • contribs) 16:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Archiving WT:BADIMAGE
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thryduulf (talk • contribs) 14:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Commons images on the main page
Hello! When transcluding a Commons image on the main page, please remember to first upload it to the English Wikipedia and tag it with the {{uploaded from Commons}} template. Otherwise, it will remain unprotected (and subject to replacement by a vandal) until KrinkleBot detects the transclusion and updates Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/en accordingly. In the Ariel Sharon photograph's case, that took about 25 minutes. It sometimes takes several hours (and it won't occur at all during an outage, such as the one that spanned several days in November).
Currently, this notice appears when the ITN template is edited. Having recently added an animated "stop" graphic, I don't know what else to try to make it sufficiently attention-grabbing. If you have any ideas, your help would be appreciated. Thanks! —David Levy 22:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK, sorry about that! It Is Me Here t / c 23:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Your signature
This probably seems pedantic, but When I went to edit something on a talkpage below your post (I have Dot's syntax highlighter on), I noticed that there seemed to be a broken HTML tag in your signature. The code of your current signature looks like this: '''[[User:It Is Me Here|<font color="#006600">It Is Me Here</font>]]''' <sup>'''[[User_talk:It Is Me Here|<font color="#CC6600">t</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/It Is Me Here|<font color="#CC6600">c</font>]]</sup>''' As you can see, one of the '''s is outside the <sup> tag, where it should be inside. I would appreciate it if you would just move the ''' one tag to the left, so your signature code would look like this:
'''[[User:It Is Me Here|<font color="#006600">It Is Me Here</font>]]''' <sup>'''[[User_talk:It Is Me Here|<font color="#CC6600">t</font>]] / [[Special:Contributions/It Is Me Here|<font color="#CC6600">c</font>]]'''</sup>
Thank you! APerson (talk!) 20:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK, is it better now? It Is Me Here t / c 23:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes - thanks! APerson (talk!) 02:22, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
ITN
Canyou provide another source for the Sappho discovery? The video can't be seen outside the UK. μηδείς (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Was just about to action this when I saw that User:Mohamed_CJ had beaten me to it. His [1] contains a link to the academic paper itself. It Is Me Here t / c 19:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Dont Worry
i add Seo Kang-joon by putting References of sources it by --Sunuraju (talk) 04:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- OK. What was at Draft:Seo Kang-joon is now in the History of Seo Kang-joon, so as to keep things together. It Is Me Here t / c 15:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Recent deaths
Any reason you removed the link for recent deaths from the main page? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's because the only RD listed there was quite old (stale); see [2] for precedent. It Is Me Here t / c 13:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Lugnuts also started a discussion about this at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive261#Main page recent deaths. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Because you thanked me...
|
You thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heartfelt... YOU'RE WELCOME! ...along with seventeen layers of fun because you deserve it! I sincerely hope that you enjoy your continued improvement of this awesome encyclopedia and the staggeringly huge community effort behind it! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! |
21:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Cite journal
Is prefered over cite doi. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Consensus is here [3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- To editor Jmh649: Could you at least
subst:the {{cite doi}}s, rather than reverting? The way the {{cite journal}}s are done at the moment is sloppy (some fields left out; e.g. "Surname AB, Lastname CD" rather than "Surname, A. B.; Lastname, C. D."). That's why I used {{cite doi}}: to get a bot to fill the template out to ensure that it would be formatted correctly. It Is Me Here t / c 17:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Most editors want the details of the refs within our articles. How does one substitute the details within the article? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- It took a bit of jiggery-pokery, but it's been done now. Is that now OK? It Is Me Here t / c 21:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- We like the refs formatted the same as the ref tool bar formats them: over one line. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- It took a bit of jiggery-pokery, but it's been done now. Is that now OK? It Is Me Here t / c 21:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Most editors want the details of the refs within our articles. How does one substitute the details within the article? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- To editor Jmh649: Could you at least
- Consensus is here [3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Is it OK now? It Is Me Here t / c 22:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- The refs were standardly formatted before. I do not understand why the reordering and the adding of the unneeded url? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Because the formatting of them is slightly more accurate, as I intimated above. But, since you keep objecting to my edits, I will no longer be pursuing this. It Is Me Here t / c 12:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- The refs were standardly formatted before. I do not understand why the reordering and the adding of the unneeded url? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
So my questions are: 1)Why the url? 2)Why change the ordering of the sections within the ref? Overall the refs got less not more consistent. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
RD
Please replace Di Stefano to RD. His death is not "stale". Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind, I've done it. Suggest your familiarise yourself with the way ITN works before wading in and making obvious mistakes. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Re your message about U.S./US and U.K./UK, I did know about that MoS rule. I cannot remember now, but going by my edit summaries, I clearly thought consistency with the rest of the article was more important. I have reverted my changes, but there still remain a lot of U.K.s and U.S.s in the article. I would have altered them now, but the "search and replace" tool in the edit box does not work, or not on my laptop at least. I have been meaning to report it for some time to the Village Pump HD and will do now. If I get it sorted out, I will come back and do those other changes. --P123ct1 (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I saw your post over on Talk:Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab about the lede, so I made a suggestion for more neutral language. Just giving you a heads up in case you want to check it out. If no one objects, we can replace the old one with this (slightly) modified one. Ljpernic (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Cascading Module:Citation/CS1
I could be wrong, but I think the only effect of adding cascading protection to Module:Citation/CS1 was to full-protect the doc page (Module:Citation/CS1/doc) and all of the templates that appear on the doc page (e.g. {{high-risk}}, {{module rating}}). As best I can tell, cascading protection applied to modules doesn't extend to any of the submodules that the module dynamically loads. So I don't think it has the effect that you imagined it would. As describing at CASCADE, we don't generally apply cascading protection directly to templates because it doesn't work well, and I believe the same it probably true for Lua modules as well. Dragons flight (talk) 19:36, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. Yes, you're right, my idea was that it automatically protect pages like Module:Citation/CS1/Arguments, and any such pages as might be created in the future. If it didn't work, please feel free to revert. Best, It Is Me Here t / c 19:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
We are trying to reduce the number of footnotes in the Lead, not add to them. See #65 "Great article" on the Talk page. --P123ct1 (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2011 Helmand Province incident
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2011 Helmand Province incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2011 Helmand Province incident
The article 2011 Helmand Province incident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2011 Helmand Province incident for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2011 Helmand Province incident
The article 2011 Helmand Province incident you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2011 Helmand Province incident for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Missa
Your hat note to Missa brevis for the so-called Lutheran Missa, Missa (Bach), would be good if the article still existed. "Lutheran" is only so-called, because the masses of only Kyrie and Gloria were liked by Catholics as well. I don't know a good way out of the dilemma. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- To editor Gerda Arendt: I am by no means a subject expect. All I wanted to do was to convert someone's pre-existing attempt to type out a hatnote in full (the code used to be "
:''see also main article:'' [[Missa (Bach)]]") into a proper hatnote template. I am entirely neutral re. the article content. It Is Me Here t / c 17:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, misunderstood. I more less unwatched the development and should have done it more thoroughly ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! |
|
Hello It Is Me Here, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list