User talk:Issac

Welcome!

Hello Issac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 23:14, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for complement

Thank you for the complement you left on my talk page. I very much appreciate it.Ortho 04:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bible votes

Hi Issac, and welcome to Wikipedia: Please see VOTE at the following TWO Articles for Deletion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the Bible and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inconsistencies in the Bible. Thanks. IZAK 07:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobov

Reb Isaac, I disagree with some of what you have written about bobov. I am not a bobover (48, 45, or any other "kupke".) you seem to be pro 45th street. while there is nothing wrong with that, and both sides definately have their opinions...

According to what you have reverted in an edit, you put Rebbe Mordche Duvid on top of reb Benzion, and deleted the tags that were in place.

Since reb benzion is a generation higher then r' md, he therefore is one "bullet" less then r' md on strictly a generational thing. and being a son of reb shloime makes him properly put before reb m.d.

so you reverted.... why? there are also some other things there that I did not feel were well put, but that was my main beef at that time. so instead of reverting back and forth, the NPOV just lets people know that "its nisht azoy pashut ve s'zet ois" ... ("its not as simple as it seems")...

anyway, now that satmar if having the fight, now the genteelness of the bobers comes out.. because hey in bobov there was nothing this bad!!!

Happy Sfira Tzaylin!

Reb Gevaldik, If you would have first looked at the talk pages of Bobov; you wouldn't have to assume anything, and you would know why. There I spell out clearly the reason for my edits. I don't have time now but in a nutshell the order of things needs to have a balance to qualify as a NPOV, so sometimes RBZH needs to be mentioned first and sometimes RMDU. As far as a successorship chart verses a genealogical chart; I clearly talk about it on the talk pages; I don't hide anything. Issac 00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might not see what I mean, because since then, the page on Ger has been altered (no pun intended). But if you go back quite a few edits you'll find a similiar successorship chart like Bobov. Issac 18:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobov

Thanks for the information. Will keep it in mind. Feel free to edit the comment regarding the Bet Din to something you feel is more authoritative. ShalomShlomo 22:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was moved from your userpage, mistakenly created, which I now deleted. - CrazyRussian talk/email 16:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come check out...

... and place on your watchlist

Cheers, - CrazyRussian talk/email 16:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contact info

Hi Issac: Gut Voch! You have not enabled your Wikipedia Email feature in your "my preferences" at the top of your user page. Sometimes editors overlook that when it's a useful way of staying in touch with other editors. Best wishes. IZAK 03:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Input needed about Hasidic dispute

Hi Issac: Please take a look at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-29 Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty). If you are able to help in any way with the issues it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, IZAK 20:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Zion Halberstam (The Second)

Good job NPOVing the article. Do you know if Rabbi Moshe Meir Einhorn was by both achtures? --Smokizzy (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind comment. The answer is yes; he was present when Rabbi Mordechai Dovid Unger and Rabbi Yehoshua Rubin were named as the successors to their father-in-law Rabbi Naftali Zvi Halberstam and he latter gave a kvittel to Rabbi Unger. Issac 17:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Image:Rabbi UngerAndRabbiRubin.jpg has contradictory license tags. If it is GFDL, that is the only tag needed. It also needs to have the name of the author and/or source of the photo listed on the image page. Thanks. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BoboverRebbeGivingShiurCholHamoadPesach5768.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BoboverRebbeGivingShiurCholHamoadPesach5768.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabbi UngerAndRabbiRubin.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rabbi UngerAndRabbiRubin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 23:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:BoboverRebbeGivingShiur.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BoboverRebbeGivingShiur.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Took care of it, thanks. Issac (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:BoboverRebbeRebNaftule.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BoboverRebbeRebNaftule.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Damiens.rf 00:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BoboverRebbeGivingShiur.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BoboverRebbeGivingShiur.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]