User talk:IssaDeK

IssaDeK, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IssaDeK! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Hirschbaeck (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Content in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable by reference to independent reliable sources – connected sources such as his own website are not normally useable. There need to be enough of those sources to demonstrate that he is notable by our standards. Any unsourced content should be removed.

The text should deal with plain facts and be written in plain everyday English; passages such as "the previous studies of form and colour, which reflected a concern for the well-being of the natural environment affected by technological development and a more and more visible urbanisation of rural areas" just have no place in an encyclopaedia.

Some copyvio has been removed; any other text copied or translated directly from published sources should also be similarly removed (it can then be rewritten).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Hirschbaeck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IssaDeK (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justlettersandnumbers. Yesterday you declined my submission for the Richard Hirschbaeck Artist Page. I made significant and strict revisions to the page in terms of neutrality of style and referencing independent sources. To confirm the subjects notability, I have added that his works are found in the highest Austrian institutions and that he was a founding member of Group 77, an important art group in Austria which is still active today. I have also changed and corrected the style of referencing. I furthermore uploaded and added two photos. The page for this artist is long overdue, and it is not within my tasks within the estate to do something like this, but rather my own initiative to put together what is already available in different sources. I would appreciate any more comments to my page and help how to make a successful entry before I submit it for revision again.IssaDeK (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Hirschbaeck has been accepted

Richard Hirschbaeck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 09:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]