User talk:IshyBamBam

Greetings

Hi all. My friends call me Ish. I enjoy authoring, nature, fishing and scuba diving.

March 2014

Please stop trying to reinsert that phrase back into Goblin shark. It was put in by a banned user who was, at the time, engaging in ban-evasion: according to Wikipedia policy, edits made by someone who is forbidden from editing at Wikipedia are, without exception, not allowed. Furthermore, because the goblin shark is still so poorly known, it is not safe to say that females are larger than the males simply because the largest known individual is female, especially when one makes that claim without first examining if there is a correlation between size and gender in goblin sharks. Lastly, it is very disingenuous, and more a little suspicious-making that you would thank me for giving a justification for the phrase's removal, and then go ahead and reinsert the removed phrase anyhow.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your comments. I put in a verifiable citation which unfortunately in my humble opinion went against your revert. 24.252.52.147 (talk) 22:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrEdna, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Favonian (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your concern. I have logged in with my native IP to put to rest any actions that incited this course. 24.252.52.147 (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that your goal? ~SLURP~ I'll still find you after being banned. IshyBamBam (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 00:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You can not do anything beyond be a nuisance. I certainly know you have absolutely no power to block me.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yes, I know exactly who you are, DoctorEdna: you're a blocked user evading her block in order to be a nuisance troll.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IshyBamBam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account is not a sock pupped. Show proof!

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. You may request unblocking from your original account only. —DoRD (talk) 04:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.