User talk:Ishdarian/Archives/2012/December

Improving Huaca del Dragón

Hi Ishdarian, I'm glad to collaborate in wikipedia. I've added some references to the article Huaca del Dragón and I improved some grammar. I'd thank to you if you give it a check mainly about the grammar to improve it. Thank you for the help you can give.--Antodeabout (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

the worldly handshake

can you please put the article up so i can revise it or send me an email to deltoro_antonio@yahoo.com if you can please because i have some professional writers who can review it and help me... please thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEIZE-101 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

helo brother pls save my article amarjit randhawa plzzz i request u plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarjit000 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

RACHA THE JEW!

why did u delete it? IT MAKES SENSE TO ME! IM FROM THE RACHIAN TRIBE I KNOW WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT! WHY IS IT INNAPROPRIOT???? WHY? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fayrema (talk • contribs) 06:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

The article was completely unsourced, incoherent, and looked like an attack page. Ishdarian 06:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

re: brooklyn law collective

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the note. I'd say importance is a highly subjective term, and further, what harm is there in leaving the page up, and allowing others to modify it, instead of outright deleting it.

BKLC is important because it supports its community through advocacy, as was stated in the article. Not sure what more you need to deem it worthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Memesak (talk • contribs) 20:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

And thanks right back at you!

Now BLPPROD'd. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy, yet here are going to and fro about an article that might well probably deleted anyway. . Thanks again.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:57, 31 December 2012 (UTC)