Jump to content

User talk:Isanjar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Isanjar. You have new messages at Dewritech's talk page.
Message added 09:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dewritech (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isanjar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Isanjar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

17:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with the wikipedia page for Intereconomics.

I have noticed that Intereconomics is classified as a maganize. But as stated in Springer (the publisher), it is a journal: http://www.springer.com/economics/policy/journal/10272?countryChanged=true

And if you see the classification in here: http://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/research-assistance/format-type/scholarly-journals you will see that it is not necessary that a journal is peer-reviewed to be a journal (for example: "The majority of scholarly journals go through the peer-review process, although there are some that are scholarly and non-peer reviewed, such as Journal of financial econometrics."(I am guessing that that is the reason why you changed from journal to magazine. If it is because something else please tell me).

Here you can also see the difference between a peer-reviewed journal and a journal that is not peer-reviewed: http://guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=31867&p=201759

Thank you for your time.

Isanjar (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Isanjar. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If you see a mistake, be bold and fix it! This time, I've changed "magazine" to "journal", as that's what the source says. That being said, I have marked the article as needing reliable third-party sources, as those are much preferred to information directly from the publisher of the journal. Did this resolve your problem? – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 15:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It did help!

Isanjar (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]