User talk:Isabella Zuralski

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I created a page for Margaret Handwerker. Ho do I upload it to the internet?

Isabella Zuralski (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella Zuralski You can create it as a draft by going here: Wikipedia:Article wizard. However, if you've created it in word, it's unlikely the formatting will work on Wikipedia. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your draft to Draft:Margaret Handwerker, the preferred location for drafts (the place where you put it was your user page, a place to write something about yourself as a Wikipedia editor). I also added a messagebox to the top that has a "Submit your draft for a review" button; if you make use of that, an experienced editor will take a look at the draft and either turn it into a live article or provide feedback on how it needs to be improved. It will not be accepted in its current state, however; the draft does not cite any references. Thus our readers cannot verify the content. It also isn't written in the formal tone required of an encyclopedia article and seems to be - at least in parts - written by the subject herself. Those parts seem also rather self-servingly promotional. Huon (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella Zuralski, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Isabella Zuralski! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Margaret Handwerker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Margaret Handwerker. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Handwerker (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What would've best convinced us is museum collections or major art reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margaret Handwerker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Margaret Handwerker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Margaret Handwerker. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Handwerker has been accepted

Margaret Handwerker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Margaret Handwerker

The article Margaret Handwerker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

On close inspection of the references provided, there is neither enough coverage of this person to satisfy WP:GNG, nor do they meet WP:CREATIVE. I can't see evidence of significant critical attention. Only one piece apparently temporarily appeared at the Chigago Institute of Art, so this does not constitute a substantial part of a significant exhibition. The only criteria I could see this coming near meeting is "represented within the permanent collections" in that the Art Institute of Chicago and the Skirball Cultural Center apparently purchased the two pieces. However they were only temporarily on display.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Margaret Handwerker

Hello, Isabella Zuralski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margaret Handwerker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]