User talk:Isaacnewton7

Esto iniciara el proceso, no?--Isaacnewton7 21:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Caroline Doggart

I have no reservations anymore, now that information has been added. Originally, there was no explanation of why the subject was notable. In fact, an editor had tagged the article for speedy deletion. I didn't think it satisfied any of the criteria for speedy deletion, so I removed the speedy deletion tag and sent it through the full process. In a few days, the AfD will be closed; let's just let it run until then. --N Shar 20:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did respond

Please look at the bottom of my talk page, where I moved your post. I didn't delete it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DoggartClarkson.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DoggartClarkson.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 23:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eton College / Sebastian Doggart / last caning

That's very interesting, do you have a source for that? -- Alarics (talk) 14:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But where did he say or write this? Unless it has been published by a reliable source, it cannot be included in Wikipedia. -- Alarics (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Isaacnewton7! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 240 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Matthew Woolf - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skype

You might note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sebastian Doggart, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you.--Rumping (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again[1] --Rumping (talk) 11:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again[2]. To address the root cause of the problem you can follow the instructions to disable the Skype extension here --Rumping (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:OfficialposterTrueBromance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OfficialposterTrueBromance.jpg, which you've sourced to Official poster of True Bromance. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:OfficialposterTrueBromance.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:OfficialposterTrueBromance.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Faust: From Condi to Neo-Condi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Faust: From Condi to Neo-Condi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Faust: From Condi to Neo-Condi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of True Bromance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article True Bromance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Bromance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Woolf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Woolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Woolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zoe Gensel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoe Gensel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Gensel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 20:05, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]