User talk:Isaacl/Address problems without creating new specialized rules
I agree and there should be a WP: type of shortcut to this page. In general I think that editors should only be blocked per policy or guideline, and should never be blocked if the justification is only based on essays (one/some editor(s)' opinion) and not policies or guidelines (rules that actually have community consensus). 03:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
- I think you may have missed the point. I think we need fewer link targets (so see no need for one for this page), and more judgment used, not reliance on guidelines and policies to become more detailed. isaacl (talk) 03:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that guidelines and policies should become more detailed, but rather, I'm saying that if an editor is not complying with an essay but is complying with policies and guidelines, that that editor should remain unblocked and unsanctioned. 05:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️
- That however is not what I'm saying on this page, and is to some extent counter to it. isaacl (talk) 13:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that guidelines and policies should become more detailed, but rather, I'm saying that if an editor is not complying with an essay but is complying with policies and guidelines, that that editor should remain unblocked and unsanctioned. 05:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC) TOA The owner of all ☑️