User talk:Isaac Jung

Welcome!

Hello, Isaac Jung!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Isaac Jung/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 10:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Isaac Jung! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 10:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Isaac Jung/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathematical oncology (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft seems to be largely written with a large language model, which is generally not helpful for creating Wikipedia article content. Please rewrite this in your own words. Let me know if you have any questions! (please

mention me on reply; thanks!)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathematical oncology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not remove AfC notices from the draft if you plan on re-submitting it, as it comes off as an attempt to hide previously given feedback and is not looked upon well by reviewers. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. A page that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathematical oncology (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dr vulpes was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathematical oncology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr vulpes (Talk) 22:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove AfC tags from drafts

I have warned you about this once before. AfC has certain idiosyncracies in the way it operates, and continuing to remove the template history will be interpreted as disruptive attempts at trying to fly under the radar with this submission, and could lead to you being blocked. You have the option of disengaging with AfC and moving the draft into article space yourself, but there is an expectation that you abide by community standards if you want to keep using draftspace. Let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TechnoSquirrel69, I've been working on the Wikipedia draft in google docs and copying it over. What section of the draft are AfC tags in so that I won't remove them in the future? Isaac Jung (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Issac, they're at the very top of the article and are marked with  in the source code; the {{AfC submission}} and {{AfC comment}} templates should generally not be edited unless you're an AfC reviewer. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for letting me know! Isaac Jung (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]