User talk:Irving2000
September 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Jenrick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eronymous (talk) 18:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Eronoymous,
- Please desist from your attempts to suppress and censor legitimate facts. The fact that Jenrick, who is a leadership contender, broke the rules to favour to a former Porn Baron offers a clear index of character and political operandi. The edit is factual and public interest, and as such will be re-instated. Irving2000 (talk) 06:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- What you wrote has nothing to do with your edit, and you are clearly breaking WP:NPOV in attempting to push your own character judgement onto a public figure. You have a history of making such edits spanning several years. Eronymous (talk) 18:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Eronoymous,
- Jenrick's breaking of the rules to favour a Porn Baron is factual and is important in establishing the political and moral character of Jenrick. How readers interpret the facts is certainly not for you, or myself for that matter, to pre-determine or censor. If I may ask, why are so keen to elide the pornographic activities of Desmond and Jenrick's distribution of political favours, especially when against the rules, to a Porn Baron? Irving2000 (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Jenrick, you may be blocked from editing. Michaeldble (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Michaeldble,
- Please provide your rationale as to why factual information regarding Jenrick's giving favours to a former Porn Baron, which is clearly a relevant index of character, should be omitted? I have yet to see a coherent reason. If you can provide an explanation as to why it is not relevant then please state and justify it, rather than band around accusations of vandalism. I do not accuse you of vandalism for your edits so please accord the same respect to others. Irving2000 (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Michaeldble,
- I note, with interest, the lack of explanation and justification in terms of your deletion of relevant and factual information. If you have one, please provide it here, otherwise the edit should stand. Irving2000 (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- What you wrote has nothing to do with your edit, and you are clearly breaking WP:NPOV in attempting to push your own character judgement onto a public figure. You have a history of making such edits spanning several years. Eronymous (talk) 18:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
