User talk:Ironman706

Nathalie Mallet

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nathalie mallet, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/A37CDERNB4GQWO. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article at this point does not appear to violate copyright. However, it is lacking in independent reliable sources. To demonstrate that the subject is notable—and that the article should not be subject to speedy deletion—the article should cite independent sources such as magazine articles about Mallet, etc. —C.Fred (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Princes of the Golden Cage

A tag has been placed on The Princes of the Golden Cage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bit Lordy (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Princes of the Golden Cage (novel)

I have nominated The Princes of the Golden Cage (novel), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Princes of the Golden Cage (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bit Lordy (talk) 14:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:PrincesOfTheGoldenCage2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PrincesOfTheGoldenCage2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PrincesOfTheGoldenCage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PrincesOfTheGoldenCage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]