User talk:IrishKofe

March 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maccan family have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maccan family was changed by IrishKofe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955871 on 2024-03-25T01:57:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Maccan family, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at McCann (surname), you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at McCann (surname). 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maccan family. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CanonNi (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit

howdy fellow editor,

i noticed a removal of sourced information, and i restored it.

this will need consensus.

thanks for helping,

Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good evening,

i noticed more removal of sourced content, without valid explanation.

please discuss these edits on the talk page of the relevant articles and seek consensus.

thanks again, Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

how is sourced content a hoax? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 02:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits

good afternoon little warrior,

i read through the sources, and the content deleted.

you'll need consensus to make these edits, as you are removing well sourced text without sufficient explaination.

have a wikipedia day,

Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, I don't think that a hoax without reliable sources need a consensus to be removed. --IrishKofe (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you would need to do is impeach the sources that are there. The article talk page is best for that. _signed,Willondon (talk) 02:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for taking the time to help me with my encyclopedia.

you'll need consensus for the deletion of sourced content.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed only the content not given by the sources given in references (rigging of the sources) anf I don't need a consensus for that.

Please note : the editor IrishHistory123 is a sockpuppet of the block sockpuppets at It.Wikipedia : IrishistoryBot, IrishHistory123, Historiafamiliae, Cicerone84, 1MarkBot are blocked sockpuppets at It.Wikipedia [1] [2] [3][4] [5]

--IrishKofe (talk) 03:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good evening,

i noticed you're insisting on edit warring, rather than using consensus to resolve disputes.

it's not encouraged, in fact, it's disruptive.

I'll read over your strident and repeat deletions, one more time, but i truly think this belongs on the talk page of relevant articles.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 03:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax content with fakes sources given by a socckpuppet. Sorry no need a consensus.

Please note : the editors IrishHistory123 and Historiafamiliae is a sockpuppet of the block sockpuppets at It.Wikipedia : IrishistoryBot, IrishHistory123, Historiafamiliae, Cicerone84, 1MarkBot are blocked sockpuppets at It.Wikipedia [6] [7] [8][9] [10]

--IrishKofe (talk) 03:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting

Hi @IrishKofe, I noticed you've been trying to change Maccan family into a redirect without consensus. You've also been reverting other editors' edits without properly explaining why. (Your edit summaries claim the page was a hoax by sockpuppets without proving that they are). Please stop doing so without achieving a consensus on the talk page. Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at McCann_(surname).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

IrishKofe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request to be unblocked. My action was justified and in a good faith to remove the hoax with false or fake or unacceptable sources from the cross-wiki sockpuppet IrishHistory123 and Historiafamiliae blocked for this reason at fr. Wikipedia for this [11] and blocked at It.Wikipedia [12] [13] [14][15] [16].

There is no need to find consensus with a crosswiki sockpuppet which publishes on 3 articles with overlapping/duplicate the same content that is a hoax with false or fake or unacceptable sources. It's a shame that no one took the time to dig deeper to understand the real problem and that I was in a good faith. Thanks. --IrishKofe (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

The user is correct; the users Historiafamiliae, IrishHistory123, AlmanachGotha88, AlmanachGotha, Alicesmeraldo and Cicerone84 are now checkuser blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Maccan family, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you need to leave other people's comments alone, regardless of their status. You are allowed to mark them as by blocked users, but you shouldn't remove them -- leave that to more seasoned users. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]