User talk:Irina1953

A tag has been placed on Cincopa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. —Swpb^talk 17:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to write an article about Cincopa, I would recommend drafting it in your user space at User:Irina1953/Cincopa. Once the draft is good enough to become an article again, you can then take the article to Wikipedia:Deletion review to request that your draft be accepted as an article. If you need help with the Deletion review process, you can ask me or another editor for help once you are ready to proceed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article, in its latest form just as surely as any earlier form, clearly did not meet the criteria for inclusion here. There must be significant coverage of the subject in multiple reliable secondary sources, which show that the subject is substantially notable. Clearly, the admin who carried out the deletion agreed with my assessment. Speedy deletion is reserved for articles which obviously do not meet those criteria. Before you try to create another article, I would strongly encourage you to use the article wizard to help you determine if the subject merits an article at all, and if so, to create an article that meets our well-honed criteria. Also, please add messages to the bottom, not the top, of other users' talk pages. —Swpb^talk 17:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although this has reviews, they're still not significant enough to satisfy our policies; this specifically needs all available major independent news; no press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews or similar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:James.h259/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently too suggestive of an advertised business profile, focusing with all additional reviews may help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:James.h259/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:James.h259/sandbox

Hello, Irina1953. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 03:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]