User talk:Irarmy

Ethical consumerism critics revert

Sorry for the delay in answering your comment. Here is the basic problem and it's not about the information in your edit but about how it conforms (or not) to best Wikipedia practices. On Wikipedia we prefer to use secondary sources over primary ones. Your edit was basically just one long quote from a primary source. What we want is a summary of the positions taken by primary sources as reported by reliable secondary sources. This is not an indictment against Zizek but just more about how best to present the information.

Also, it was rather long which did not really fit in well with the rest of the article. If you have any more questions or comments you can reach me on my talk page. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)