User talk:Iralwynn

Hi! It's me from over at irrealis mood. I'm curious, what's the rationale for the grammar edits you're making? Botterweg14 (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC) @Botterweg14: I second this question. Iralwynn, could you discuss your issues on the talk page before making the same revisions over and over? Zhen Zhen (talk) 02:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irrealis mood.

You can have a desirable wish, but this doesn't make the verb present tense. It has the same tense as the irreal wish. e.g.: I wished I went there. You cannot change. It is neither present nor past, it is conjuctive II, which is also used in conditional clause. The same as the expressions of feelings and what is on mind. e.g.: I think she love me. < It is possible, but it is not given for sure. Iralwynn (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this also the case in other languages? It's very interesting that the "irrealis" structure would show up in the main clause (i.e. on an attitude verb like "wish"), not just in the complement clause. Botterweg14 (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The main clause shows it up as an indicator for the irrealis mood, like the subjonctif in French, except that English hasn't an own conjugation for it. Or other: the wish itself is irreal. Iralwynn (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only one who does soy is you. You stop and want to stop people from thinking. So if Wikipedia is fascist, block me. If not, stop interrupting everything! Iralwynn (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 22:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 22:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]