User talk:Iraag

Introduction

Hey! this is Iraag welcomes you here. Well, you can leave your message below and do try to keep it neat and clean as much as it's possible. Iraag (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

The basics

Hello, I don't know if you have already, but I highly recommend you read the 5 Pillars of Wikipedia and get used to the policies and guidelines before doing any further editing. If you have questions, let me know. JMHamo (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Iraag, considering everything that came out on ANI,[1] and the erraticness of your editing, I've had to block you indefinitely. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and you just aren't doing the encyclopedia any good. Being blocked from editing means you can only edit this page for the time being, not the rest of Wikipedia. There's nothing to stop you dialoguing with JMHamo about the basics of editing here on your own page, for instance, as he offered to above. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iraag (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that I've committed a mistake but I don't think that blocking was a solution rather helping me out. Even no one has considered my comments on ANI before blocking me Its like every admin went against me as well as I think someone who have argued me in this matter have more than 1 account and that must be considered.

Decline reason:

I feel there is insufficient evidence for me to support unblocking at this time. --slakr^\ talk / 10:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"a mistake"? Numerous mistakes I think you mean, and you'll need to be able to identify each one, explain why they're wrong, and advise how you'll fix it so it won't happen ever again. Of course "every admin" probably spoke against you: that's because we're aware of all the policies you're violating D P 10:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transparency International India

Hello Iraag,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Transparency International India for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Transparency International India.gif

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Transparency International India.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]