User talk:Ipsitapati

This is Ipsitapati's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ipsita Pati (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has notability issues and tone issues. The tone is entirely non-neutral and is written to praise the subject rather than to describe her. (No specific example is given because the entire draft is peacock language.) The references are malformed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ipsita Pati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ipsitapati, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ipsita Pati (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft still has notability issues and tone issues. In particular, it requires a complete rewrite (not a tweaking) to be neutral.

The references are malformed.

If you can't write about yourself in Wikipedia without praising yourself, don't write about yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ipsita Pati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ipsita Pati (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"She shot into fame in the glamour world by storming into Miss Universe India final in 2010 and getting crowned Miss South India in 2008" is still peacock language in the voice of Wikipedia. Do not remove AFC decline notices from drafts. They are part of the history, and are removed when the draft is accepted, but not before.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ipsita Pati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not remove AFC decline templates from draft articles. They remain with the draft until it is accepted. Maybe you didn't notice that. Now you know.

The submission of autobiographies is discouraged largely because it is often very difficult for the subject to write neutrally about themselves. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ipsitapati, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ipsita Pati, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 10:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Ipsita Pati. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 10:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 10:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Ipsita Pati

Draft:Ipsita Pati, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ipsita Pati and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ipsita Pati during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ipsita Pati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ipsita Pati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipsita Pati until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ipsitapati", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a name of notable person. If you are the subject of article Ipsita Pati or someone who shares the name, send an email to info-en@wikimedia.org to verify your identity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Anup [Talk] 15:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Anup: The subject sent an email to Wikimedia (ticket:2016102510004721) which satisfied me. I did caution the editor that they have a conflict of interest and gave advice on how to address issues.--S Philbrick (Talk) 20:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've invited them to article's talk page to suggest their changes. Anup [Talk] 21:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are on the same page, that was the advice I gave (with the exception for negative unsourced information, which can be removed).--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ipsitapati. You have new messages at Anupmehra's talk page.
Message added 18:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Anup [Talk] 18:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not your personal web-space

Please stop repeatedly adding unverified information to your article. You can add all these stuffs on your personal website or social networking websites (Wikipedia is not any of them). I've undid your changes once again and I'm not liking it to go over there and revert your changes everytime. I would highly recommend you to take a look at our Conflict of Interest and Plain and Simple Conflict of Interest guidelines and follow suggestions offered there. If you want to add something in your article, do not directly edit the article, instead request your changes on article's talk page. Thank you. Anup [Talk] 10:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]