User talk:IpsiDixit
March 2018
[edit]
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 17:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Re March 2018
[edit]I didn't use the talk page "for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics." If you weren't a shadow activist, you would realize that my comment was indeed discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, namely by removing its activist elements. Stop abusing your power as a Wikipedia admin, a title that should probably be stripped from you in light of your inability to be impartial.
You need to abide by the Expectations of Adminship [[1]]. Please replace my comment. I am expressing my concerns directly to you and attempting to come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. If you refuse to replace my comment, I will proceed with dispute resolution and address my concerns regarding your suitability in a Request for Arbitration.
- So you're not a new user, and you're here to abuse talkpages as soapboxes. Thanks for letting me know. Acroterion (talk) 18:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Is that what you took away from what I said? Where did I claim to be a "new user"? This account is years old. So pointing out egregious POV issues is "abus[ing] talkpages as soapboxes"? Unlike you, I have no agenda. I merely saw blatant advocacy in an article and reported it. You're the one who clearly has an axe to grind by spewing political advocacy under the guise of "impartial" information. Your safe space culture has turned you paranoid. I'll pursue my arbitration remedies since you're clearly more interested in bullying innocent users acting in god faith than you are interested in actually being an impartial administrator.
- Four years old but it's puzzling that your contribution history shows no contributions before this year. By the way, there's nothing her that suitable for the Arbitration Committee to deal with. Doug Weller talk 10:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- And that's why Wikipedia is a failed propaganda machine lulz. The difference between you and I is that you are on the payroll. IpsiDixit (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alerts
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.