User talk:Iorek100

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Iorek100! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:21, Sunday, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The least dangerous assumption (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like journal article abstracts / excerpts. Needs context as to what this is about. See WP:NOTJOURNAL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The least dangerous assumption and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The least dangerous assumption, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iorek100! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The least dangerous assumption (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still doesn't explain what the term means and what the context of it is for. Needs an extensive writeup on the history. Who coined the term? When did it come about? How is it widely used?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The least dangerous assumption and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The least dangerous assumption, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Least dangerous assumption has been accepted

Least dangerous assumption, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal

From a quick Google search it is clear that we need an article about "presumption of competence". A rather broad concept relevant to a range of fields ranging from ethics, to education, commercial laww, criminal law, psychology, etc. So you are invited to collaborate with me at Draft:Presumption of competence if you'd like to. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree more! And would love to collaborate with you on this. Only thing is I have a few big papers that I have to get done and I would need to give this some time. I'm a lot clearer in Feb. If that's a deal breaking delay then I'm prepared to try to fit this in, but if you are happy to wait a couple of months then go at it, that would mean i could give it a little more attention. Don't know how to sign this on my phone! Trying tildes... Iorek 19:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Or indeed if you are thinking of working on it right now and getting on with it, also cool, I can definitely work on bits and pieces of targeted stuff anytime really Iorek 19:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, just want to update you on this. I've unfortunately had a few health issues that took my attention away from working on this draft. I would however like to get stuck into it fairly soon, perhaps after the holiday season which is always a busy time for me with a slew of family commitments. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After the holidays sounds good to me! Iorek 09:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)