User talk:Iokseng

Welcome!

Hello, Iokseng, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JRawle (Talk) 14:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. JRawle (Talk) 14:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martyr's Shrine

I noticed you requested the deletion of Martyr's Shrine. I am not sure the WP:CSD criteria apply, but I agree it could be confused since there's at least one other martyrs' shrine in Wikipedia. I have made it a disambiguation page. Let me know if that works for you, or if you're seeing something I am not. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kagrra

The title of the article should be "Kagrra" per Wikipedia's guidelines. I already included these in the edit summary, so you could read them, but here they are in detail:

MOS:TM

Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official":
- avoid: REALTOR®, TIME, KISS
- instead, use: Realtor, Time, Kiss

MOS:JP

Japanese books, CDs, etc. may have their titles inscribed or advertised with conventions that are not used in English or with special typographic effects. And, if part or all of the title is in roman letters, capitalization may be not be in accordance with English practice.

Within independent writing in Japanese about these products, it is not unusual for many of these idiosyncrasies to be preserved; and thus Japanese-language Wikipedia has articles titled:

Within the English-language Wikipedia, however, capitalization should be conventional (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), e.g. "BEST" only so written if pronounced "bee ee ess tee"), and dashes, nakaguro (dots) and the like should be cut. Thus the following would be suitable as either article titles for or references to the above:

Kamen featuring Tatsuya Ishii [or] Kamen (featuring Tatsuya Ishii) [or] Kamen (song)
Best: First Things
Maze (song)
Live (television series)

Denaar (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions of Asian interwiki links

Half and hour ago you removed three interwiki links to Asian articles on fishing. Your edit summary said "fix interwikis". Looking at your edit history, I see you have a habit of doing this, such as here and here. Please explain what you think you are doing. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking again, I see most of your edits seem to be changing or deleting Asian interwiki links. Please explain. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then explain clearly exactly why you removed these three interwiki links from Fishing. Each of those links were entirely correct, and pointed unambiguously to the correct corresponding articles, as far as I can see. --Epipelagic (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well okay, but why are you just deleting the links? If your reasoning is correct, and the Asian wikis had more comprehensive articles dealing with fishing, then you should have changed the name of the links to go to the more comprehensive fishing articles. Then you should have added the original links to the appropriate Wikipedia article on angling or recreational fishing. If Asian wikis have no article on fishing more comprehensive than the articles already linked, then the links should have remained as they were. I am concerned that you seem to be indiscriminately just deleting interwiki links, instead of fine tuning them so they point more accurately to the most appropriate articles. You see, you are not "fixing" the interwiki links, you are just removing them. A slightly misdirected link is better than no link at all. --Epipelagic (talk) 03:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Assembly Library of Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The library is located next to the [[National Assembly station on newly constructed [[Seoul Subway Line 9]]. Exit through exit 1.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mythic aquatic creatures

You moved Category:Mythical aquatic creatures to Category:Mythic aquatic creatures. Why? The former appear preferrable William M. Connolley (talk) 15:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Iokseng. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Iokseng. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iokseng. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transformers deities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Transformers deities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Hello @Iokseng, some contributions you have made do not meet the neutrality required to comply with this Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. For this reason, some content has been modified or removed. Please modify the paragraphs or sections that show a partial point of view, replacing them with a more neutral and objective text in line with what is expected in an encyclopedia. 132.147.97.21 (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]