User talk:Iogoay

October 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page WikiLeaks worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 19:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article WikiLeaks, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WikiLeaks with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to WikiLeaks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WikiPuppies! (bark) 20:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on WikiLeaks. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.TMCk (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. I specifically refer to your recent edits on Julian Assange.
- Regards, 220.101.30 talk^\edits (aka 220.101) 10:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 17:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/13990974@N04/5147778133/. As a copyright violation, File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Julian Assange - CC image.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Karppinen (talk) 17:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quoted source was correct - it was CC, but not a CC suitable for WP - it was CC BY-NC 2.0 Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

When citing sources for a statement, please make sure that they actually support the information in question. I checked both sources you cited here and they do not mention Assange at all (yes, I created an account on Mundia to check that database entry - it shows a pedigree until present times, but the name Assange does not appear. And it lists only one child for George Ah Sang and Mary Whyte - not 6 children, as you claim).

Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]