User talk:Iofur Raknison

Regarding reversions[1] made on November 27 2007 to Mozilla Firefox

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See [2]. You are adding WP:OR to the article. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not OR, I only cite reliable source. Thank you for your cooperation. Iofur Raknison (talk) 22:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page. There were also complaints about that specific bit. Nishkid64 (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but verifiability is more important than consensus. Thank you for your time. Iofur Raknison (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you add questionable material to an article, other editors have a right to discuss it. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, Nishkid64, you have requested full protection of article in question (right after you reverted to your preferred revision), but you failed to mention that you are part of this "edit war". This is not appropriate behaviour, don't you think? Iofur Raknison (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's perfectly legitimate behavior. Protection is not an endorsement of the current version of the page, so it doesn't matter who asks for article protection. Besides, many posts at RFPP for full protection come from editors who are engaged in the edit wars themselves. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]