User talk:Invincible Fire star

Welcome

Hello, Fire star on heat, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! TheImaCow (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please be careful about edit summaries - you can't defame a mythological character

And although that edit was badly written and didn't meet WP:VERIFY, neither do yours. I don't see a lot of sources coming from you. It's a terrible article because it has so few academic sources discussing the subject. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which article? Fire star on heat (talk) 03:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to comment on edit summaries Fire star on heat (talk) 03:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This one.[1] - a bad editor, but you can't defame a character. Doug Weller talk 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understood. Thanks for support. I am new to wikipedia.

Hi! Can we have a talk here? N1234567 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we can discuss here Fire star on heat (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 14:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Divyam Seth. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, bhima, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Divyam Seth (talk) 07:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Hindu mythological wars shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 09:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me. I reverted in order to restore to previous version. As you told I'm not intending to edit war. I dont know about 3 revert rule. From now I will be careful. Once again thanks for telling me about this. But once again I'm making clear I'm not doing edit war. I reverted in order to restore previous version. Yesterday some users tried to destroy the article. I reverted all those edits. If I make changes I thought wikipedia members like you may think that I'm bringing vandalism as a user "Divyam seth" mentioned. So not to get blamed, I reverted. Later I came to know that I reverted 40+ edits. So it is wrong as you told me. Thanks for letting me know. Thank you so much and I won't do it again. Fire star on heat (talk) 11:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vijaya (bow); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ed6767 talk! 03:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Characters in the Mahabharata. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What wrong I did. I didn't understand. I added content and citations in the above mentioned article. Infact I helped article. I didn't remove any template in the article. You are repeatedly warning me without me committing any mistake. When I added a discussion in your chatbox, you deleted it. Fire star on heat (talk) 11:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of demigods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand what is link. Is it brace that I added to character Nara ?

Please note the discretionary sanctions for Indian articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 16:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Warning gave to Dinesh2069 (talk · contribs)

I have warned him on his edits on mythological articles. From next time if he misuse editing again report to the administrators. He should be blocked after that.

Thanks,

🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 08:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the fake blame on me

U have not edited from 18 hrs but why am I getting the warning yet. N1234567 (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have not even edited from long hrs even knowing that you guys have no sense of reality N1234567 (talk) 13:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you for your unsourced editing in article Draupadi. Your edit was reverted by other user named Panchali Draupadi but he/she didn't warn you. I warned you so that you won't repeat it next time. Have a nice time. Fire star on heat (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Fire star on heat. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! - TheresNoTime ^😺 11:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Can you please look into Bhima page? It has been vandalized a lot.

Thanks. (Panchalidraupadi (talk) 17:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Sure Fire star on heat (talk) 03:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About List of characters in the Mahabharata

You deleted info about Rochamana, Senabindu, Agastya and more characters in the article "List of the characters in the Mahabharata". I know they originally mentioned in Mahabharata.

You mentioned bhandasura in the same article. But, he is not mentioned in Mahabharata. Karasingam 2.0 (talk) 01:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]