User talk:Investigation11111

Welcome!

Hello, Investigation11111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLoS
Identifying reliable sources (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your own talk page.

Square root of x formula. Symbol of mathematics.

If you are interested in mathematics-related themes, you may want to check out the Mathematics Portal.
If you are interested in improving mathematics-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Mathematics (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Marvellous Spider-Man 16:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation11111, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Investigation11111! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok, Thank you so much to help me for using Wikipedia. Investigation11111 (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nizameddin Isgenderov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nizameddin Isgenderov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://mechmath.bsu.edu.az/en/content/nizameddin_isgenderov_552. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation11111 (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)i am so sorry for my mistakeInvestigation11111 (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC) User:Investigation11111 Investigation11111 (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC) ok i understand no problem, again sorry, regardsInvestigation11111 (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Windham, Connecticut

Thank you for your edit to Windham, Connecticut. I reverted your edit because most of the links you made were not correct. For example, you added a link to Scotland, when in fact the link should have been made to Scotland. This can be avoided by using the "show preview" and then testing your links. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Djemaa Beni Habibi has been reverted.
Your edit here to Djemaa Beni Habibi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://afalaz.wordpress.com/2009/01/24/djemaa-beni-habibi-wilaya-de-jijel-algerie/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation11111 (talk) 21:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC) ok, thanks your gentle response instead of my mistake Investigation11111 (talk) 21:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC) XLinkBot (talk)[reply]

Please slow down

At Endowment Fund for the Memorial of the Shoah and Oskar Schindler, why did you add c:Category:Holocaust denial and c:Category:Holocaust denial in Austria? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of places in Arkansas

Why did you add a link to Kalamazoo, Michigan? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Investigation11111 Investigation11111 (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC) this is my mistake just i will make correct, i am new one here. i just learn how does wikipedia work i am so sorryInvestigation11111 (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Magnolia677 (talk)[reply]

Please take some time to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Otherwise you are creating work for others who are cleaning up your edits. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nizameddin Isgenderov

Hello, Investigation11111. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nizameddin Isgenderov, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nizameddin Isgenderov to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Roxy the dog. bark 15:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

Hi and thanks for your additions to Danielle Bleitrach. I wanted to give you a head's up that, per MOS:DUPLINK, intra-Wikipedia links are generally only used the first time a term is mentioned in an article. Not a strict rule, but for the sake of avoiding clutter, they should only be added again if there's a strong reason (for instance, in an infobox, as a reader may read that independent of the entry's prose and thus not see a link in the body of the entry), rather than linking at every opportunity. Hope that's helpful; happy editing! Innisfree987 (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Investigation11111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Weis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Azerbaijan's National Foundation for Entrepreneurship Support

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Azerbaijan's National Foundation for Entrepreneurship Support requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://anfes.gov.az/en/pages/e250c4ac-d0eb-102d-90d7-0bda273183fc/ABOUT%20FUND.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

German villages in Azerbaijan

Your article seems to be covering the same material as Caucasus Germans and History of Germans in Russia, Ukraine and the Soviet Union, in parallel to Volga Germans and Volga German Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. I think you'd be better to stick to the topic in the title, German villages in Azerbaijan rather than replicating other articles.

A few other points I noticed:

In 1941, after the World War, Germans living in the former USSR - 1941 was during World War II not after, and at that time the USSR wasn't former.
preserved in our capital - it's not my capital, nor the capital of most people who will read the article.
You also have a number of problems in your verb tenses - for example, 23133 Germans had lived in Azerbaijan should be were living unless you're counting all the Germans from 1816 to 1939. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi, Thank you very much for reading my article attentively and inform me about the mistakes. I made minor corrections taking into consideration your advice. There are several articles like this on wikipedia. I created this article to show these villages as concrete places. For example, in article about France information was given about its economy, history, culture etc but also there are separate pages on each of these topics. Therefore i think my article should not be deleted. Investigation11111 (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to explain your edits adding, for example, Gerald Ford to a category of slave owners. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

jpgordon I am sorry for this rude mistake. Please read my explanation fully. Because I am very interested in working on Wikipedia and feel so bad I have been blocked. I aimed to create a "see also" section for all US presidents’ articles. It was too late to delete my mistakes when I understood that I have mistaken, and other editor already removed all of them. However, I could delete 2 of them myself. I did not do it with the purpose of vandalism. If you take a look at my contributions and talk page you can see that even I don't have any warning about breaking Wikipedia rules. I have nearly 700 edits. I accept that my mistake was very gross technical mistake made by my unawareness about U.S. and I apologize for that. Additionally, I do not have any provocation or some negative opinion about U.S.Presidents. Additionally I want to note that I am a Wikipedia user for 5 months and I know the rules well enough. I know that this is not possible to give any idea without any reliable sources. There is no information or claims about the president of Gerald Ford in List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves. This is simply my technical mistake. I found the article List of Vice Presidents of the United States by time in office in Wikipedia and I thought that I could add this article with its “See also” section to each president's article as a category. I mean in this way:

You can see if you take a look at my contribution section. My first edit starts with Daniel D. Tompkins and I added above-mentioned 3 pages untill article of George H. W. Bush president. If you look at article of George H. W. Bush president, you will see that there is List of Presidents of the United States, sortable by previous experience existed in see also section. After I pasted 3 pages, it looked like below:

Then starting from article of George H. W. Bush president till article of the Martin Van Buren president , I began to paste 4 pages in each article. These 3 following pages already existed before my edit in Martin Van Buren:

And after this article, when I was adding “see also” to other alternative pages, I copied all of 6 page names from article about Martin Van Buren. That is why I pasted automatically 6 pages in the following articles. Such as:

But I was deleting the existing links every time while I was pasting. But after doing editings I realized my mistake and immediately started to delete them and saw somebody else already removed. Please consider my mistake as very rude mistake and I kindly ask you to unblock me as I explained above that edit was a mistake. I promise to be more careful next time.Investigation11111 (talk) 05:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Investigation11111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for this rude mistake. I aimed to create a "see also" section for all US presidents’ articles. The thing is when I copied “see also” section (which I added ) from one president's article to another, the category of "List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves" was also copied automatically and unintentionally. I didn’t type it, it was just copy mistake. If you look at my contribution section, you can see that I deleted 2nd edit (Hubert Humphrey ‎, Alben W. Barkley ) when I understood my mistake. But when I wanted to delete that edit mistake from "Gerald Ford" page I saw other editor already removed it. I did not do it for the purpose of vandalism. If you take a look at my contributions and talk page you can see that even I don't have any warning about breaking Wikipedia rules. I have nearly 700 edits. I kindly ask you to unblock me as I explained above that edit was a mistake. Hereinafter, certainly I will be more careful. Investigation11111 (talk) 08:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't ring true to me. For example, this edit and this one and this one are different. This isn't a case where you copied the links and simply pasted them into a bunch of places without checking. I can't see any explanation apart from you wanting to deliberately claim these presidents owned slaves. Now, maybe you have an explanation, something to explain how you could accidentally make that claim without this just being a pasting error. If so, you are welcome to request another unblock and a different admin will review your case. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla I thank you for responding me. But I think you are coming a bit hard on me. Please read my explanation fully. Because I am very interested in working on Wikipedia and feel so bad I have been blocked. It was too late to delete my mistakes when I understood that I have mistaken, and other editor already removed all of them. However, I could delete 2 of them myself. I accept that my mistake was very gross technical mistake made by my unawareness about U.S. and I apologize for that. Additionally, I do not have any provocation or some negative opinion about U.S.Presidents. Additionally, I want to note that I am a Wikipedia user for 5 months and I know the rules well enough. I know that this is not possible to give any idea without any reliable sources. There is no information or claims about the president of Gerald Ford in List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves. This is simply my technical mistake. I found the article List of Vice Presidents of the United States by time in office in Wikipedia and I thought that I could add this article with its “See also” section to each president's article as a category. I mean in this way:

You can see if you take a look at my contribution section. My first edit starts with Daniel D. Tompkins and I added above-mentioned 3 pages untill article of George H. W. Bush president. If you look at article of George H. W. Bush president, you will see that there is List of Presidents of the United States, sortable by previous experience existed in see also section. After I pasted 3 pages, it looked like below:

Then starting from article of George H. W. Bush president till article of the Martin Van Buren president, I began to paste 4 pages in each article. These 3 following pages already existed before my edit in Martin Van Buren:

And after this article, when I was adding “see also” to other alternative pages, I copied all of 6 page names from article about Martin Van Buren. That is why I pasted automatically 6 pages in the following articles. Such as:

But I was deleting the existing links every time while I was pasting. But after doing editings I realized my mistake and immediately started to delete them and saw somebody else already removed. Please consider my mistake as a very rude mistake and unblock my profile. I promise to be more careful next time.Investigation11111 (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to request another unblock. My decline was based on not being able to understand how you could possibly make the mistake you made. But, I want to be clear, the key point was not understanding. I definitely grant that you could indeed have been acting in good faith, it's just that we really need a compelling explanation before unblocking, in a case like this. Your explanation here may indeed be sufficiently convincing now, so I suggest you request an unblock and have another admin review your case. :) --Yamla (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Investigation11111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for this rude mistake. Please read my explanation fully. Because I am very interested in working on Wikipedia and feel so bad I have been blocked. I aimed to create a "see also" section for all US presidents’ articles. It was too late to delete my mistakes when I understood that I have mistaken, and other editor already removed all of them. However, I could delete 2 of them myself. I did not do it for the purpose of vandalism. If you take a look at my contributions and talk page you can see that even I don't have any warning about breaking Wikipedia rules. I have nearly 700 edits. I accept that my mistake was very gross technical mistake made by my unawareness about U.S. and I apologize for that. Additionally, I do not have any provocation or some negative opinion about U.S.Presidents. Additionally, I want to note that I am a Wikipedia user for 5 months and I know the rules well enough. I know that this is not possible to give any idea without any reliable sources. There is no information or claims about the president of Gerald Ford in List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves. This is simply my technical mistake. I found the article List of Vice Presidents of the United States by time in office in Wikipedia and I thought that I could add this article with its “See also” section to each president's article as a category. I mean in this way:

You can see if you take a look at my contribution section. My first edit starts with Daniel D. Tompkins and I added above-mentioned 3 pages untill article of George H. W. Bush president. If you look at article of George H. W. Bush president, you will see that there is List of Presidents of the United States, sortable by previous experience existed in see also section. After I pasted 3 pages, it looked like below:

Then starting from article of George H. W. Bush president till article of the Martin Van Buren president, I began to paste 4 pages in each article. These 3 following pages already existed before my edit in Martin Van Buren:

And after this article, when I was adding “see also” to other alternative pages, I copied all of 6 page names from article about Martin Van Buren. That is why I pasted automatically 6 pages in the following articles. Such as:

But I was deleting the existing links every time while I was pasting. But after doing editings I realized my mistake and immediately started to delete them and saw somebody else already removed. Please consider my mistake as very rude mistake and I kindly ask you to unblock me as I explained above that edit was a mistake. I promise to be more careful next time. Investigation11111 (talk) 12:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'll assume that this was some strange accident, and having begun to self-revert before the block counts for something. Please make sure next time that the edits make sense before rolling them out to dozens of articles - and not just that they make sense on one page, but on all of them. Huon (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huon Thank you so much for reading my whole explanation and positive responding to my unblock request. I am sorry again. Promise, hereinafter, certainly I will be more careful. Investigation11111 (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

William Pitt (1805 EIC ship)

Hi Investigation11111, just want to ask why you changed the pseudo headings to proper headings. When you do that, you make the table of contents box at the head of the article longer, without adding functionality. (On a simple article four out of six items in the contents box may simply be the "Citations..." headings.) Is there anything an editor can do with the new headings that they couldn't do before? If not, what's the gain that compensates for the aesthetic loss? Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Acad Ronin Hello, first of all, welcome to my profile. :) If we separate the Reference heading into 3 parts, why cannot we write them as subheading? Actually, I do not see any differences between them, I just wanted to change the article according to the Wikipedia rules. But it is your article, of course, if you want I can delete my edit. It is just a minor edit. Regards Investigation11111 (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Acad Ronin, I mean like this: Conscription in the United States you see? :) Investigation11111 (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azerbaijani diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Independence of Azerbaijan

Hello Investigation11111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Independence of Azerbaijan for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Declaration of Independence (Azerbaijan).

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Slatersteven, The page you say is about document of İndependence Declaration. The page I created is the history of independence of Azerbaijan and it has the Russian version see. Please delete the speedy deletion request and wait for the article to complete.

Deletion discussion about Independence of Azerbaijan

Hello, Investigation11111,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Independence of Azerbaijan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independence of Azerbaijan .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 10:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cross-article disruptive editing, dropping state-sponsored irredentist links/websites as "sources" in order to claim Nizami Ganjavi as "Azeri",[1] and to claim the historic Iranian province of Azerbaijan as "South Azerbaijan"[2] (amongst others). - LouisAragon (talk) 17:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I did not know it was a disputable issue. Thank you LouisAragon for informing me. I will remove the parts you mentioned and add this material to the text again. I hope, there will be no problem. Regards Investigation11111 (talk) 09:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Abdulrahman Bashkan) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Abdulrahman Bashkan, Investigation11111!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It states in the lead that he is a politician, but that is not mentioned in the main body of text. Could you add something?

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Machine building in Azerbaijan) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Machine building in Azerbaijan, Investigation11111!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The History section needs some references.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pipelines in Azerbaijan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absheron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Police Academy (Azerbaijan)

Hello Investigation11111,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Police Academy (Azerbaijan) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://axc.preslib.az/en/page/shSvZwk4be, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Timeline of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 manat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 5 manat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Investigation11111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of museums in Baku

Hello, Investigation11111,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating List of museums in Baku! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 13:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Individual denominations

I have redirected 5 manat, 1 manat, and 10 manat to Manat. I will be improving Turkmenistani manat in the following days and aim for a potential GA. I request that you salvage all the information and do the same for Azerbaijani manat.

A reader is far better served by a singular article for the currency than articles for each domination. Except if the indivudual denominations have an illustrations history and cannot be easily accommodated at the parent article. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Index of Abkhazia-related articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Index of Abkhazia-related articles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Abkhazia-related articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azerbaijan Anti-Corruption Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azerbaijan Anti-Corruption Academy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan Anti-Corruption Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 100 manat

The article 100 manat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicates content at both Turkmen_manat#Banknotes and Azerbaijani_manat#Banknotes_3 so neither is an appropriate redirect target. Rather odd to combine unrelated banknotes in one article like this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]