User talk:Invader Soap

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 00:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Sklocke (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Navigation: 1, 2

If you want to send me a message, you MUST send it into Archive 2, OK!

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Invader_Soap.

Your edits to MM

Just to let you know, adding {{sprotected3}} does not protect an article; only administrators can do that. If you have any questions, please let me know. —tregoweth (talk) 18:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Invader22.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Invader22.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected templates

Mainly {{sprotected}}, which adds the full notice to the article, and {{sprotected2}}, which just adds the padlock in the corner. And if you're curious, Category:Protection templates has all sorts of templates. —tregoweth (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I had to delete it.

No, it's a mirror-image ambigram, meaning it looks the same if you look at it in the mirror. It's not rotationally symmetric. Λυδαcιτγ 03:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please don't perform non-obvious page moves without gaining consensus on the talk page. Thanks. -SpuriousQ (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me emphasize what SpuriousQ says. Your action in moving Google Earth and Purple were disruptive and if you continue to disrupt Wikipedia in this way it is likely that you will be blocked from editing. Please stop. Gwernol 03:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a automated to all bot operators

Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

I have removed the {{bot}} and {{sprotect}} tags from your userpage. This account is not a bot and adding the sprotect tag to a page does not protect it - only admins may protect or unprotect a page. Please do not add misleading tags to your userpage. Thanks, Gwernol 03:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Xst.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Xst.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you run PickupTruck.com and created the image yourself, you cannot tag it as GFDL, because you do not own the copyright on it. —tregoweth (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated message to bot owners

As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:

Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.

Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 03:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- you seem to be misunderstanding certain aspects of Wikipedia and how it works. You may want to start here for more info on how to get around here. —tregoweth (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Beautiful Name!

Why thank you. I like yours too :). XD Invader Soap. Haha! Nishkid 64 17:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HelpMe

What do you need? — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 03:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Do you want help from an administrator? Or do you want information on how to become an administrator. — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 03:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, you will need to learn more about what administrators do, see WP:ADMIN. Then, if you think you are ready, apply at WP:RfA. You need to make sure you have no previous history of vandalism etc (I see you have been making some page-moves without consensus, that could be seen as vandalism), also the several times you've used {{sprotect}} and the likes may not go in your favour. The community looks to people who have been here 6-12+ months, and have several (usually at least 3) thousand edits. At the moment, you have 86 edits. I doubt you would be granted adminship at the moment. Work on those things (article writing, other contributions, 6-12 months worth) then you should be ready for adminship. — D e on555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 03:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop posting nonsense to other people's user pages, or you will be blocked for vandalism. —tregoweth (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't. --Invader Soap -- He wanted you to ask/answer you something. This automated notice is by him. If you have any questions, please let me know here. 17:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Invader Soap! I see you've been having a few problems on Wikipedia in the past, I was wondering if you'd let me help you out and try to turn you into the model wikipedian! I'll simply look through your contributions and talk to you about things you've done well, maybe should have done differently. May I ask you a few questions?

Yes, dude! ----Invader Soap^{Evil Jokes}_{Gir's Dog}February 13^th, 2007 (UTC)

What tasks to you want to get involved in on Wikipedia? I mean, writing articles, tagging pages (e.g. for cleanup), anti-vandalism e.t.c.

I probably don't know about this. But I should've been good a few weeks ago. ----Invader Soap^{Evil Jokes}_{Gir's Dog}February 13^th, 2007 (UTC)

What are your main interests? We could maybe find you a few good articles to write about.

My main interest is [probably] editing minorly. ----Invader Soap^{Evil Jokes}_{Gir's Dog}February 13^th, 2007 (UTC)

Have you got any questions you'de like to ask me? I really hope you'll let me work with you, I can see you have something to give to the project, Regards RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what, dude! I'll help you and you can protect me! ----Invader Soap^{Evil Jokes}_{Gir's Dog}February 13^th, 2007 (UTC)

Blocked indef

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any active administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 17:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Sky_Grand_Canyon.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Sky_Grand_Canyon.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Invader Soap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like a requested complaint here. Have you noticed that I have a very good artistic talent here. And I will like an unblock request here. Notice that some users are not socks of Sklocke. I am only going to say this once. Here is a list of non-sock users: Dab235, Gir55, and Invader Zim 3. So, are you okay with that now? :*)

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock. - auburnpilot talk 01:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Invader Soap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm innocent.

Decline reason:

You'll need a better reason than this. Why is it that you're back after 5 months of inactivity? — Pascal.Tesson 15:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain the connections outlined in this ANI thread? ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 15:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]