User talk:InvaderCito

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Postclassical Era may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Postclassical Era may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and began to start mass conversions that developed into the [[Russian Orthodox Church]]).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, InvaderCito. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postclassical Era, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kievan Rus' "fix"

Hello (and welcome from another amateur contributor/editor). I've noticed that you added a 'fix' to the so-called successors of Kievan Rus', as well as the Grand Duchy of Moscow. I thought it prudent to give you a heads up regarding this being a sensitive area as the references you use (as per your user page) aren't really as comprehensive as is required in such a specialised area. Much work has been invested in elaborating on and improving information there rather than simply rehashing mainstream Western perceptions based on outdated sources. The editor who has been reworking the Kievan Rus' page (actually, there are a number of editors actively engaged in it for the long haul) structured the infobox as it was for good reason. If you're interested in discussing the issue, rather than engaging in quick fixes, your input would be appreciated starting from the relevant talk page. Thank you for your interest! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my bold edit. I had no idea there was an active overhaul going on here. I had noticed that the Grand Duchy of Moscow appeared to flow smoothly after Kievan Rus' and had jumped to the conclusion that I could put it down as a successor. The other successors I had assumed were mistakenly structured like that. Unfortunately you're right when you say that my resources are too comprehensive, and that my knowledge is not detailed enough, so I'm not really qualified to help in this area. I'll be more careful with my edits from now on. Thank you. — InvaderCito (talk) 02:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, InvaderCito. Please, by no means should you feel that you can't join in! I'm going to make a note of your addition to the talk page. I simply didn't have time as I was late for a meeting. No doubt you'd be well aware of the part Thucydides played in the methodology deployed by the western world in the 'art' of chronicling history. The so-called successor status of the Grand Duchy of Moscow is something of a fabricated history. The whole area is extremely convoluted and, due to the later influence of Imperial Russia, much in the way of claims to this status are being questioned as they are tenuous: a method of elevating their status as a long established empire in the eyes of other European powers if you will. I'd be more that happy to discuss this at greater length if you're interested. History is dotted with a plethora of comparable manipulations in the name of political & economic appearances. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYE, take a look at the talk page, "Successor states". The entire section has been eliminated - the rationale is outlined there. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postclassical Era, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hijra and Hellenism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Early modern period, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diet of Speyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, InvaderCito. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I don't know if you still hang out here, InvaderCito, but I just realised how much work you did on Post-classical history. I also love that it was you who, back in 2013, put the hatnote on Middle Ages reminding people how Eurocentric that article is. Thanks for all your work back in your student days! Alarichall (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi InvaderCito! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]