User talk:IntoCreativeJan

Please post all entries below the line below, and start new entries at the bottom of the page. Thank you.

---

About Headstrong Sales

Look! The news on Billboard site was posted on February 14, 2007, ONE week after albums release, so the album had sold 64,000 in the first week on U.S, not in total sales. Voices4ever 15:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC).

Headstrong sold 68.000 copies in the first week. You can see here (www.worldwidealbums.net/). And the album sold 946.000 copies around the world (you can confirm in the same link). So, when the 'edit block' in article ends, please don't remove true informations.

And one more thing: why you deleted the "single release details" section and the "singles release dates" in the infobox? Voices4ever 15:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

First of ALL. The reference sites that the album sold 880,000 world wide not 68,000 in the first week. So stop thos claims. And i removed the singles releasen dates becasue it was repeated two times there were two singles release dates sections.IntoCreativeJan 15:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


Headstrong sold 68.000 copies in the first week worldwide yes (not only in USA), you can see in that site. In USA, I don't know how many copies Headstrong had sold in the first week. Voices4ever 13:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

No you cant and that site is a non reliable blog so find another source.

So is this all resolved? Gimmetrow 00:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles‎

Thanks for the compliments, but while I've done a lot of work to Beyoncé Knowles‎, the person who's done the most work to the article recently is a user called Efe. Also, I didn't create the Vanessa Hudgens page: I created her template: Template:Vanessa Hudgens, which is used for navigating to articles about her. :) You are right that a lot of vandalism is done to pop singer articles; a lot are semi-protected. Brenda Song, however, is protected due to a dispute rather than vandalism. Acalamari 16:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Song

Do not do full wholesale reverts. Are you the same as the IP address editor? Gimmetrow 20:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Um, I thought we had an understanding. You just reverted everything again. Gimmetrow 23:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I did not i listened to your instructions. Is that revrting oh sorry. Sorry if that was reverting.

I'm guessing you don't see the details I worked on. That's fine, but I don't want to do them again. Give me an idea what you're trying to do and we'll work on it together. Gimmetrow 23:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

OK. I don't really see what you did [1]. It looks like you might have gone back to your version and copy-pasted a few sections from the other version. If so, I appreciate the good-faith effort. Give me an idea what parts of the text you really want to be different, and I'll merge it in. Gimmetrow 23:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok that's great. I am trying to have the Early Life section with more detailed text like when i tried to add the

"At age 3, Song began modelling and appearing in several commercials including a Little Caesars and Barbie commercial at age five, with future co star Raven Symone. Song's family relocated from Sacramento to Los Angeles when she was 6 to support her acting career."[2]

And the ealy work section was split into two. I added a "Disney Channel beginning (2003–2004)" which was part of the early work section. I also added more text regarding Song's first Disney Channel movies and there success like the amount of viewers. Which was at the time the highest. Song's movies made Disney Channel Disney Channel the most-watched network on all of television in the time period (broadcast & basic cable) according to one source. [3] And information that was missing in the beginning. Like nielsen ratings, viewers and success. And then a "Breakout performance" section. [4] regarding her projects from 2005-2007. The sections in the beginning were very short and minor so adding notes, casting, production and success would improve the article. I also made some changes to the public image section making it the personal life section and added Song's agency and residence since that was featured in the current proects section, another reason i changed the heading becuase public image and charity work is mainly associated with personal life and Song's agency and residence should not be in the current projects section.[5]

The introduction was your version, but i added more parts to the early life section as i showed you earlier. And then added a Disney beginning section from 2004 to 2005, and then in that process i worte more detailed text the only change i made the hading and this:

"In late 2004, Song starred in the Disney movie Stuck in the Suburbs, where she portrayed Natasha Kwon-Schwartz. The film recieved an average 4.5 million viewers which made the film the highest top rated and most viewed TV movie in 2004. The film broke records and Song quickly became a teen idol before landing the lead role in the Disney Channel Original Series, The Suite Life of Zack and Cody. She earlier starred in another Disney movie called Get a Clue with Lindsay Lohan, where she portrayed Jennifer. The film was the first Disney Channel Original Movie to reach 1.02 million viewers beating Hilary Duff's Cadet Kelly. "

The breakout section included the original wendy wu summary with some added preferences and text like:

"The film was about an average, popular American teenager, Wendy Wu (Song), and then suddenly, her life is turned upside down by a visit from a young Chinese monk Shen (Shin Koyamada), who claims she is the reincarnation of a powerful female warrior and the only person who can prevent an ancient evil spirit from destroying the world. Both Song and Koyamada are professional martial artists, Song holds a black belt in Tae Kwon Do. The film was written for Song before production."

"In 2006, Song won a Asian Television Awards for the "Best Newcomer Award" and a "Disney Channel Japan" award for "Favorite Disney Channel TV Star" for her performance in the movie. Song also was a part of the Wendy Wu ensemble win at the San Francisco International Asian American Film Festival. Song was the youngest actress to recieve the award at age 17. Song breakout performance in the movie recieved many positive reviews from international publications including the New York Times, TV Guide and Vanity Fair."

and the current prjects section was the same but the residence and agency was transferred to the personal life section which also has the ranking and in that proccess i added more detailed text for the unrelased movie American Darling but what i dis was very short and then i added more text regarding the college rad trip movie's box office success.[6] IntoCreativeJan 23:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I think the article should be merged OK now. See, wasn't so bad after all. Nice working with you, and welcome to Wikipedia! Gimmetrow 00:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Brenda Song <3

Stops erasing the information that I writed of Ashley, only it you do because you hate Ashley and a friend I use my acount to erase Brenda's things without I knew it, nevertheless it your erase my information of ash and you place information of false brenda as the charts in where you mentioned my blog in where Brenda never to charted here also cited miley cyrus charts for brenda WTF?, please you do not erase info of ashley and I do not erase of brenda's info.

Probably you do it because you think that I hate Brenda but I you swear that I was not the yearling lamb this info of Brenda, a friend I use my account please do not be wicked and you do not continue erasing ashley's info let's rest both artists. I love u :( you have msn? User_talk:Deinaked 15:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Listen i did not remove ashley's information for no reason. Your text was false due to the fact that the references were wither broken, forums, fansites or dont even mention headstrong. Another thing is that i gave you several warnings and you just ignored everything. And Brenda's song had charts that were referenced and i did not create that chart or submit the info i only reverted your edits because you removed them for no reason yet again. Another thing is that the blog does mention Song in the next page and i will remove that blog reference because blogs, forums and fan sites should not be used as references on wikipedia. The text in the headstrong page was reported inaccurately and i noticed that you the fully trusted users do not seem to check the references submitted which is quite dissappionting. User_talk:IntoCreativeJan 16:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Headstrong (album). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tombomp (talk) 18:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[7] What are you doing? Do anything like this again and you will be blocked from editing along with every other account you use. This is your last warning. Gimmetrow 22:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jennygossipgirl.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jennygossipgirl.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

First if all the image i first uploaded meets with these terms listed below. But then For An Angel replaced my screenshot from an episode with a photoshoot from god knows where. And used my summary and description with the same rules. Look at the history page to see the difference. For An Angel claims that the image he replaced is more detailed. When it was really a non free image used on wikipedia without permission using my summary of the first screen shot i added. The screenshot i added was self made and not with a fake summary. You surely can not blame me for that.

Here are a list of terms that meet wikipedia guidelines from the first screenshot i submitted to wikipedia before For An Angel replaced the screenshot with a non free portait.

1. No free equivalent exists that would effectively identify the article's subject.
2. The image does not in any way limit the ability of the copyright owners to market or sell their product.
3. The image is only used sparingly and is rendered in low resolution to avoid piracy.
4. The image has been published outside of Wikipedia, either as an optical disc format, media broadcast, website content or computer software.
5. The image meets Wikipedia's media-specific policy.
6. The image meets general Wikipedia content requirements and is encyclopedic.
7. The image is used in the article wiki-linked in the section title.
8. The image is significant in illustrating the subject of the article, facilitating critical commentary as it provides an immediate relevance to the reader more capably than the textual description alone.
9. The image is used in the article namespace.
10. The image has a brief description that identifies the image, and provides attribution to the copyright holder.

IntoCreativeJan (IntoCreativeJan) 05:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brendasongtb 4agy.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brendasongtb 4agy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brendasongtb 4agy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brendasongtb 4agy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:ANI thread regarding you

You may wish to view this thread here regarding you and edits made to Ashley Tisdale related articles. Wildthing61476 (talk) 16:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC) _{(Please note, I am not passing judgment on your edits, but advising you of this thread)}

In light of this list of accounts, please choose one account to use from now on. Gimmetrow 18:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Your disruptive editing with sockpuppets has exhausted my patience. No more warnings. Gimmetrow 19:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Account?

Hello again. Would you please pick one account to use exclusively, and let me know what it is. Otherwise it's difficult to communicate with you. Gimmetrow 21:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dan-humphrey-pic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-humphrey-pic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Brenda Song

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Brenda Song, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Brenda Song has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Brenda Song, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)