User talk:Intlprincemak

February 2015

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prince Mak

The article Prince Mak has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JBH (talk) 04:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intlprincemak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Intlprincemak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Prince Mak. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 20:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prince Mak, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prince Mak, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Drm310 (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Prince Mak. Drm310 (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prince Mak. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Drm310 (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Prince Mak has been reverted.
Your edit here to Prince Mak was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4fGYf1YTRcFtSZyX1odeZw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Prince Mak, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Prince Mak was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4fGYf1YTRcFtSZyX1odeZw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Mak

Hi. Before we get started, I recommend reviewing all of the article creation and etiquette guidelines here at Wikipedia, as you failed three of them with your comment at my talk page. 1) You did not put your comment at the bottom of the page. 2) You did not create a new section for your comment. 3) You did not sign your comment. And of course, your request itself was absolutely 180-degrees opposite of what Wikipedia is all about. Not to mention, the subject of your article most likely fails Wikipedia's notability requirements, as he does not appear to have any notability outside of his group.

Now, let's get to your request. In short, no. 1) You don't own articles. 2) Your article appears to be a huge conflict of interest, as you claim to be creating content on the orders of the subject of the article himself, which is very discouraged on Wikipedia. 3) Your article's external links flagrantly violate WP:EL. 4) And again, all articles are subject to editing by all editors, and all articles are subject to Wikipedia's requirements, guidelines, and recommendations, as well as United States copyright laws. I will edit the article however I see fit in accordance with WP standards, and other editors will do the same. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I recommend "Prince Mak" refrain from any and all efforts to create and edit his own Wikipedia article or that of JJCC. Shinyang-i (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shared account?

Are multiple people sharing this account? Please note that this is not allowed (see WP:SHAREDACCOUNT). If there is more than one person editing from this account, the account could be blocked. Random86 (talk) 00:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, just me "Ashley", I just told to a member of the fanclub for helped me! but only for a moment!

Ok, good. :) You signed your name as "Noraxd" once, so it looked like multiple people. In the future, please remember to sign your posts. Random86 (talk) 00:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]