User talk:Interstate 285

My name is Scott AKA (Interstate 285). I like to read articles about Interstates. My favorite Interstates are Interstate 85, Interstate 285 (The perimeter), and Interstate 485 (Charlotte).

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Interstate 285, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Imzadi 1979 → 01:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of 2006 December (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 20:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate 285 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet user:2006 December is a person that I known who is my brother

Decline reason:

Per WP:BROTHER. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{I did not get a expired date please info me the date.}}

In the block notice above it says This account has been blocked indefinitely. Hope that clears it up. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{Do I get another account to start out fresh. I enjoy Wikipedia.}}

Not unless you can convince the community that you understand why you were blocked and acknowledge evading the block by creating another account. It would also help if you learned how to use templates properly; you don't need to put curly braces around questions. I suggest you carefully read Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks before posting another request. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll read it carefully and I'll follow the directions.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate 285 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fell I can be responsible user on Wikipedia, and I'll edit things that are NECESSARY, and to start out fresh with a new account.

Decline reason:

This does not meet Mr. Jamie's request above. Kuru (talk) 11:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given the block evasion, the poor quality of most of your edits (both from this account and the master account), and what appears to be poor command of the English language, I do not believe that allowing you to edit here is of any benefit to the encyclopedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 14:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to Wikipedia, I might need to get know it, I think I deserve a second chances. I do put things that can help the community. Also, I am a different user from 2006 December. To Kinu.....

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate 285 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I was block because I am sock puppet of 2006 December, but I really do have a brother on Wikipedia. I use two accounts because I wanted to have two accounts. I did not do this to disobey the editing blocks with the accounts. I usually have two accounts on every thing on the web.

Decline reason:

This makes no sense at all. You both have a brother and sockpuppets. I'm not convinced. Max Semenik (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm revoking talk page access here. This is clearly a waste of everyone's time. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.