User talk:Interpuncts/Archive 1

September 2014

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dawes Act because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1.

That's what I reverted it to. If you looked at my contributions, you'd see that my edits are in good faith, and are not aimed at causing detriment (you identified it as 'vandalism'.) Cheers. · | (talk - contributions) 16:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And while I'm at it, how is your reversion superior? It doesn't look that way from here. · | (talk - contributions) 16:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interpuncts, I completely agree that your edits are correct. I think I somehow got confused about which edits I was reverting. My apologies! Jacona (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interpuncts, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Interpuncts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalize articles, as you did here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Kingdom_general_election,_2015&diff=661440976&oldid=661440732 Wereon (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please explain to me how that's vandalism. No, please do. · | (talk - contributions) 19:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]