User talk:Interfocca213
July 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Tim Kash. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 23:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Tim Kash edits
[edit]Please justify your persistent removal of verifiable and accurate references from BBC News, IMDb and the Independent from the Tim Kash article. There are a number of usernames (including yours) who keep reverting to the same version of the article (using colourful, unverifiable language to portray Kash in a good light, with no mention of anything that could be seen as low points in Kash's career, even though they are integral to the article) and whose only activities are to revert the Kash article to the inaccurate and poorly-written version. It could be coincidence, or it could imply that just one person with a vested interest is trying to keep their preferred, if heavily biased, version online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.164.251 (talk) 03:17, 24 July 2010 (UTC)