User talk:Intel44

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Rklawton, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 04:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Alison ☺ 05:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-confessed sock of User:Ibm44, same insults, same vandalism, same everything - Alison ☺ 05:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intel44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what the...im no sockpuppet i only know the guy dosnt mean i have anything to do with him. i think this is very unfair and i made a mistake edit and i reverted it myself after i realised what i done. fair go please unless you have proof that I am a sock puppet besides that comment left??

Decline reason:

Blatant sockpuppet. — Yamla 23:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

prove it?