User talk:Inside99

April 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Freedom of religion in India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relation with User:Govindi33? Both of you have the same pattern of editing, better respond and clear this up. Read WP:SOCKPUPPET, you can get blocked for doing this. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 16:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Inside99 (talk)