User talk:Insanity Incarnate/Archives/2012/February

always revert my contribute

Hai Insanity Incarnate,

I dont know why you always revert my contribute, what I was written is real fact. So please dont ever try to revert back anymore. I love to give much contributes to this group 'The Boss', so I will never give fake story about them.

Thank You

The Boss huge fans

Daeguknamah (talk) 04:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I reverted your edits not because I thought that the information was false, but because what I saw of it seemed to be mostly trivia not suitable for Wikipedia. After reading through the page and your edit history, I see that much of the information you have added, which I reverted, was indeed valid, although some changes still were necessary. I have cleaned up the page and fixed these problems to a large extent. If you would like to discuss the issue further, please do so on the article's talk page. —Insanity Incarnate^Talk 06:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Hello Insanity Incarnate. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however, regarding Joey Essex, that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), pure vandalism (G3), and copyright violations (G12) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 14:24, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Not Vandalism... false report?

I am not sure how this is classified as "vandalism" when it is a known fact. Could you please elaborate? What can I do for my changes to be saved?

Thanks, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.89.158.176 (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

When you make a claim like the one you are making on Melissa Harrington, be sure to always cite your sources, especially on a biography of a living person. Without any reliable sources to back up the claim, it looks like vandalism. —Insanity Incarnate^Talk 19:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Gamma Kappa Phi

There are lots of "inconsistency" regarding the page of our fraternity and it needs further review. We do not know where you get these data??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agasagas (talk • contribs) 21:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Your edits were reverted because they are informal comments more suitable for the article's talk page (Talk:Gamma kappa phi). Hold discussions on the article at the talk page, and add appropriately encyclopedic content to the article itself. —Insanity Incarnate^Talk 22:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Input request

You have contributed to article The Really Big Show (formerly Rizzo on the Radio). This article is currently being considered for deletion. Please consider providing input at the article's discussion page: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Really_Big_Show.  Levdr1lostpassword  (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)