User talk:Inops/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Inops. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Inops! Thank you for your contributions. I am Guerillero and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Guerillero | My Talk 22:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome, Guerillero.

--Inops (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

non-derivs license images not allowed on Wikipedia ???

Where does wiki policy say "non-derivs license images not allowed on Wikipedia "--Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I linked to the wrong project page in my edit summary. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#The short version, it underlines Wikipedia policy on derivation licenses. --Inops (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Somaliland

My edit on the Somaliland article was far from point of view. Anyways, British Somaliland never became independent on June 26, but rather on July 1st when it merged with Italian Somaliland, which formed the Somali Republic. The United Kingdom had no intentions of forming to separate nations. AcidSnow (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Dissolution of Parliament

"When Parliament is dissolved, every seat in the House of Commons becomes vacant. There are no Members of Parliament. MPs revert to being members of the public and lose privileges associated with being a Member of Parliament... Until a new Parliament is elected, there are no MPs. Those who wish to be MPs again must stand again as candidates for election." See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom#term end for MPs - Dissolution of Parliament. Don't revert me with bullshit fallacious reasons. Keri (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

That policy looks to have been changed very recently. If that sticks, you've got a backlog of MP articles to fix.

Also, you might want to dial back on the vulgarity, there's a lot of shrinking violets here. --Inops (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Northwest Europe map

I feel the map you are adding is POV, showing England as a definite part of northwest Europe but not northern Germany which is at largely the same latitude, top and bottom. On what basis have you determined as such? I have modified the previous map to make no distinction between maximum and minimum extents. However I would be fine with a map showing England, the Netherlands, and northern Germany in the minimum extent, while leaving south Germany, north France, Belgium and Luxembourg in the maximum extent, on the basis of latitude. Possibly even three shades. Minimum, usual, and maximum? Sometimes "Northern Europe" at least only refers to the Nordics, excluding the British Isles entirely. Rob984 (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I honestly don't have a POV on a rather obscure, arbitrary division of the countries of Europe, believe me. The reason I changed your map, and later created a "forked" version, is because it contradicts the text of the English article. If you can find a reliable reference that explicitly treats Scotland any different to the rest of the British Isles in regards to this definition, feel free to change the text in the article and revert your new modification. To your suggestion of including the rest of the British Isles, plus the Netherlands and northern Germany in the minimum extent, but leaving out the other low countries and southern Germany, etc, I'm fine with that. That actually fits better with the current article text, so I think that would be more proper. To "minimum, usual and maximum", I think that might be pushing it -- the "minimum" and "maximum" definitions are tenuous enough, considering definitions such as "Northwest Europe" are basically a way of saying "this vague pattern of countries here".

If we are to keep the "minimum" and "maximum" distinction, Iceland might want to be added to "minimum", and (even) possibly Switzerland (but that might make the north Germany and north France line look rather starkly arbitrary) to "maximum". But those are both fringe cases, I would have thought. --Inops (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Single poll when none other was done yet is

Very relevant.

Also statistical significance vastly higher than regular polls, as the only parameter is regretters, where the confidence interval is small (i.e. high confidence). If you wish to argue more open a thread in the talk page and lets decide after a consensus is reached. Thanks Jazi Zilber (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Inops. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diocese of Brechin (Episcopal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Changes in majority

Please don't remove these. They may not mean much (though a seat moving from apparently safe to very marginal or vice versa could be interesting), but they are found in standard reference works such as Craig, and N/A is simply inaccurate unless the current or previous election was uncontested. Warofdreams talk 21:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Northern England map

Hi, thanks for the map of the historical counties of Northern England - it's a useful addition. I've kept it in, but I've also restored the "gateways" image. Point is not just to show those branded as gateways by councils, but to show where different people draw the lines (Richmond is MUCH further north than Watford Gap, for instance). If you have a better suggestion for the title ("Suggested southern boundaries of the North"?) we can change it. Smurrayinchester 21:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Smurrayinchester 21:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Dark side of the moon

Hi, because you have previously written about this subject in the past, could you please offer your views on the dispute on the article Moon, that is being discussed at Talk:Moon#Dark side of the moon, regarding the terminology of "dark side of the moon"? Thank you. —Lowellian (reply) 20:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Am I being detained? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Am I being detained?. Since you had some involvement with the Am I being detained? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Inops. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Tyne and Wear ethnicity

I think the ethnicity data I provided on Tyne and Wear is correct. I know it does not provide a direct reference but the site I gave, UK census data, is correct as it gives the same figures as ONS. The reference from the Guardian states that for example, the the borough of Gateshead was 92.9% white british in 2011 when the correct percentage was as recorded in the same census as 94% as stated by ONS. Maybe the section should be deleted as no direct or reliable reference can be provided.--2.26.154.89 (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

I've changed to the more reliable ONS report on the 2011 census for the numbers. [1] provides the exact numbers across the former county for the various racial groups (scroll down to "Download (.csv)" -> in the drop down select "former metropolitan county" -> "Download"). I worked out the percentages from there, a lot more reliable than jury-rigging the individual borough statistics together. --Inops (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks--2.26.154.89 (talk) 07:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Cambridgeshire (historic)

I've been bold. Chrisieboy (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Inops. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

See webpage

The broadcaster has since stopped the current series from being shown and it has also removed all of the past episodes from its ITV Hub catch-up service.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/14/jeremy-kyle-show-guest-steven-dymond-tragically-died-happened-9526114/amp/?usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D Cpqueeley89 (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Cpqueeley89, ITV not offering episodes online doesn't affect the tense we use for the show. Please see WP:TVLEAD, particularly

References to the show, and its characters and locations, should always be in the present tense, as the show will still exist even after it is no longer airing new episodes (e.g. "The Dick Van Dyke Show is a...").

--Inops (talk) 14:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough... Would like to use past tense as people would think that the show was still on air, but get your point Cpqueeley89 (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Edits to Assembly/Senedd pages

Hi @Inops:. I appreciate you are entitled to your opinion about best practice for the pages National Assembly for Wales constituencies and electoral regions, and I will not be reverting them thus causing more confusion. However the name change and the other contents of the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Act 2020 will take effect in May 2020, not 2021 as you stated. Please see that article for an explanation. This was the basis for my edit, as it is clear these articles will need renaming in nearly three months time, and in my view Wikipedia should reflect the law as passed in January. Llemiles (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

In re 2021, yes that was me misremembering. But still, as you say, it's still the "Assembly" for a few months yet, so it makes sense to keep that for the time being. The relevant provisions of the Act aren't in effect, so the legislature hasn't actually been renamed yet.

With regards to the discussion you've started on us using "Welsh Parliament" or "Senedd Cymru", I imagine a consensus will develop on which one to use closer to the time. Given the media's usage I've seen so far, simply calling it the "Senedd" (a la "Oireachtas") seems most likely to me. --Inops (talk) 23:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Inops, thanks for fixing this. And it's nice to see you like using free software! Have you tried Solus? It's rolling release but also very stable!

Aku-PDF-Finder (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Aku-PDF-Finder:. Can't say I've tried Solus. I've heard of it, though. I distro-hopped quite a bit until about five years ago, when I settled on Arch. It was good fun seeing the differences in distros, and how they're built. I switched to Debian a couple years ago because its the most similar to the machines I use most of the time at work. If I ever sour on Debian, I'll be sure to give Solus a look.

--Inops (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)