User talk:Inongimke

Welcome!

Hello, Inongimke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 04:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e decker ^talk 18:13, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benoit Poirier d'Ambreville.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Inongimke, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

I made some changes to the article, focusing on tone and on emphasizing in the intro the things that imply notability. It probably needs more work, but I'm done for tonight. See what you think.

Wikipedia's "house style" is fairly dry and formal, and must always take a neutral point of view. This writing style takes some getting used to.

In your message you mentioned issues with sources not being online. This is not at all a requirement; references to print sources are encouraged. Templates such as {{cite book}} and {{cite magazine}} can help with formatting. If the source is originally in print, but an online copy is available, you format the entry as a print source but add a "url=" field. The result is similar to the {{cite web}} template, but with some slight differences relating to the fact that the print source is the original. This may help with the issue you mentioned, with referencing print sources for which the only online copy you have found is posted on the subject of the article's web site.

I haven't read all of the sources and evaluated whether they are enough to establish notability yet. One of the issues raised at the help desk relates to the amount of coverage of him. What they are getting at is summarized here. To establish notability, there needs to be several good, reliable, independent sources that directly discuss the subject of the article.--Srleffler (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Benoit Poirier d'Ambreville, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 03:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]