User talk:InklingGirl error

March 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Copyright. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 21:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Copyright, you may be blocked from editing. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 21:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Shellwood (talk) 22:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Splatoon 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please make sure you proofread your contributions so that they are not nonsensical; "witch lasts 24 hours" in the context you used it in is not a competently written English phrase. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the edit you made to your user page, if you don't want to be blocked, you need to heed the warnings people leave you and avoid unconstructive edits. Nothing at all about your edits to Copyright were defensible. People are more than happy to answer any questions you have about editing, but if you continue those behaviors, you'll end up blocked to prevent further disruption to the project. -- ferret (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Splatoon 2. Do not change proper nouns, section headers and names to lowercase again. You've repeatedly done this and it is disruptive. -- ferret (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

`{{unblock|reason=I didn’t know that inkling is a proper noun.InklingGirl error (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)}}`

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InklingGirl error (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn’t know that inkling is a proper noun.InklingGirl error (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Ferret Fixer and Errorfixer 2. Please address this sock puppetry if you make a new unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InklingGirl error (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to revert vandalism I saw on WikipediaInklingGirl error (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 09:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

D

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOCK InklingGirl error (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 2.0

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InklingGirl error (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not going to sock puppets anymore or vandalism anymore. InklingGirl error (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that there has been nothing but vandalism from either this account or your sockpuppets (plus a stated desire to continue with the same), the standard offer may be the best way forward for you. Huon (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2.1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InklingGirl error (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really do understand what I was blocked for and I won’t do it again.

Decline reason:

Now you are just wasting our time. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as of June 2019 to continue vandalising pages. --Yamla (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]